2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-999x.2011.04142.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero Nominal Interest Rates, Unemployment, Excess Reserves and Deflation in a Liquidity Trap

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ono (2010) applies the model to analyse Japan's long-run stagnation and economic policies. Murota and Ono (2011) show that if households consider money as a target of status, aggregate demand deficiency appears. Hashimoto and Ono (2011) apply this type of stagnation model to examine the effects of child allowances on the population growth and aggregate demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ono (2010) applies the model to analyse Japan's long-run stagnation and economic policies. Murota and Ono (2011) show that if households consider money as a target of status, aggregate demand deficiency appears. Hashimoto and Ono (2011) apply this type of stagnation model to examine the effects of child allowances on the population growth and aggregate demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that (13) gives a unique value of y satisfying 0 < y < y because (8) implies c(y) + g < y and (12) …”
Section: The Consumption Function and The Multiplier Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) and Murota , fig. 1) for demand deficiency and Murota and Ono , figs. 1 and 2) for unemployment and deflation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%