2017
DOI: 10.1111/jere.12156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Macroeconomic Interdependence Between a Stagnant and a Fully Employed Country

Abstract: This paper presents a two‐country two‐commodity dynamic model where one country achieves full employment and the other suffers from secular stagnation of aggregate demand. Own and spillover effects of changes in preference, productivity and policy parameters are examined. Parameter changes that improve the stagnant country's current account, such as a reduction in government purchases, a decrease in foreign aid and an improvement in productivity, raise the relative price of the home commodity. Consequently, ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are open-economy extensions of the dynamic stagnation model, e.g. Ono (2006Ono ( , 2007Ono ( , 2014Ono ( , 2018, Johdo and Hashimoto (2009) and Hashimoto (2011Hashimoto ( , 2015, but they use a two-country setting and have much more complicated frameworks. The present analysis treats a small country case and has a simple structure comparable to the Mundell-Fleming model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are open-economy extensions of the dynamic stagnation model, e.g. Ono (2006Ono ( , 2007Ono ( , 2014Ono ( , 2018, Johdo and Hashimoto (2009) and Hashimoto (2011Hashimoto ( , 2015, but they use a two-country setting and have much more complicated frameworks. The present analysis treats a small country case and has a simple structure comparable to the Mundell-Fleming model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this permanent liquidity trap, I investigate the effects of 2 Recently, economists have proposed several types of permanent stagnation. The causes of permanent stagnation advocated by them are deleveraging shocks (Eggertsson and Mehrotra, 2014;Eggertsson et al, 2016), wealth preferences (Michaillat and Saez, 2014;Michau, 2018;Ono and Yamada, 2018), pessimistic expectations (Benigno and Fornaro, 2018), and liquidity preferences (Ono and Ishida, 2014;Illing et al, 2018;Murota, 2018;Ono, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, e.g.,Liu (2010), Chassambouilli and Palivos (2014) andBattisti et al (2018), who have used two-sector models.17Ono (2014Ono ( , 2018 have studied policy interdependence between large countries without consideration of immigration issues.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%