1999
DOI: 10.1021/jp9913012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeolite Structure and Reactivity by Combined Quantum-Chemical−Classical Calculations

Abstract: Proton-energy differences, ammonia adsorption, and D/H-exchange barriers for methane at selected isolated Brønsted sites in zeolites FAU, MFI, BEA, ERI, and CHA are studied by combined quantum-chemicalclassical (QM/MM) calculations in an attempt to understand the factors that determine the reactivity at these Brønsted sites. The barrier of the D/H-exchange reaction for methane was found to correlate well with the calculated ammonia chemisorption energy, but even better with the O-Al-O angle of the free zeolite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
308
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 353 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
308
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the used approach, the charge was neglected in the embedding scheme in order to prevent over-polarization. An alternative method would be the distribution of q(L M ) to its remaining binding partners [10] (only for the embedding-the force field still uses the original set of charges). While a variation of charges can surely be expected to have an influence, the fact that for the investigated nucleosides the charges q(L M ) provided by AMBER-99SB are all in the region between 0.01 and 0.07, this influence is only very minor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the used approach, the charge was neglected in the embedding scheme in order to prevent over-polarization. An alternative method would be the distribution of q(L M ) to its remaining binding partners [10] (only for the embedding-the force field still uses the original set of charges). While a variation of charges can surely be expected to have an influence, the fact that for the investigated nucleosides the charges q(L M ) provided by AMBER-99SB are all in the region between 0.01 and 0.07, this influence is only very minor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At such a short distance, the validity of using a point charge to represent the distribution of electron density is questionable. Special treatments are applied to the MM charges near the boundary so as to avoid this unphysical polarization [33,44,70,71,82,93,110,124]. We will discuss this problem in more detail later in Sect.…”
Section: Link Atom or Local Orbital?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[33][34][35] No electrostatic cut-offs were employed in the QM/MM calculations. Electrostatic embedding [36] with the charge-shift scheme [29,37] was used to couple the QM and MM regions. Full details of the computational methodology employed in this study are available in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%