2000
DOI: 10.1023/a:1006645515791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
29
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of liquid hydrocarbon and water in the vicinity of wellbores was considered as the main restricting parameter making only 10% of original gas in place recoverable from this reservoir (Engineer 1985). A large number of theoretical and experimental studies have been devoted to understanding, modeling, and predicting the condensate accumulation and its associated impaired well productivity (O'Dell and Miller 1967;Fussell 1973;Danesh et al 1991;Henderson et al 1993Henderson et al , 1998Fevang and Whitson 1996;Mott 2002;Jamiolahmady et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of liquid hydrocarbon and water in the vicinity of wellbores was considered as the main restricting parameter making only 10% of original gas in place recoverable from this reservoir (Engineer 1985). A large number of theoretical and experimental studies have been devoted to understanding, modeling, and predicting the condensate accumulation and its associated impaired well productivity (O'Dell and Miller 1967;Fussell 1973;Danesh et al 1991;Henderson et al 1993Henderson et al , 1998Fevang and Whitson 1996;Mott 2002;Jamiolahmady et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At such conditions, the gas passage is intermittently blocked when the condensate evolves in the pore throats and subsequently reopens when continuous viscous flow of gas breaks the capillary barrier. As a result, the increase of relative permeability with increasing velocity has been reported for gas/condensate systems at low-interfacial-tension conditions, which is known as positive coupling (Henderson et al 2000;Jamiolahmady et al 2000Jamiolahmady et al , 2003. These two distinct features pertaining to condensing fluids (i.e., coupling and inertia) can only be captured through demanding and expensive steady-state relative permeability measurements by use of gas/condensate fluids (Jamiolahmady et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior results in an improvement of relative permeability caused by an increase in velocity. This flow behavior is a well-established phenomenon proven both experimentally (Danesh et al 1994;Henderson et al 1995;Blom et al 1997;Ali et al 1997) and theoretically (Jamiolahmady et al 2001(Jamiolahmady et al , 2003. It is referred to as the "positive coupling" and has been shown to be in strong competition with the negative inertia at very high velocities (Henderson et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This representation is then used to model flow by computing and tracking the pore-scale configuration of fluid phases for different displacement sequences using empirical equations derived normally from semianalytical expressions for pores of a simple geometry. This approach has proved successful for the study of various phenomena, such as interfacial area and capillary pressure [12][13][14], reaction [15,16], drying [17], evaporation [18], dissolution [19,20], electrical properties [21][22][23][24], non-Newtonian flow [25,26], foam flow [27], solution gas drives [28,29], gas condensate systems [30][31][32], water vapor transport [33], dispersion [34][35][36], and two-and three-phase flow [37][38][39][40][41][42]. However, for pore-network models to have any predictive power for studying flow through the full range of samples encountered in geological settings, an accurate parametrization of the void space is needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%