YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Murugiah, Karthik; Vallakati, Ajay; Rajput, Kanishka; Sood, Akshay; Challa, Narasa Reddy

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.11.015

Cited by 164 publications

(157 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

140

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Examiner use other hand to passively elevate the patient's arm in the scapular plane Interpretation: Positive sign is pain within the shoulder Hawkins impingement test [23] Arm positioning:…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent

Urch¹,

Taylor²,

Cody³

et al. 2016

HSS Jrnl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The internet has an increasing role in both patient and physician education. While several recent studies critically appraised the quality and accuracy of webbased written information available to patients, no studies have evaluated such parameters for open-access video content designed for provider use. Questions/Purposes: The primary goal of the study was to determine the accuracy of internet-based instructional videos featuring the shoulder physical examination. Methods: An assessment of quality and accuracy of said video content was performed using the basic shoulder examination as a surrogate for the Bbest-case scenario^due to its widely accepted components that are stable over time. Three search terms (Bshoulder,B examination,^and Bshoulder exam^) were entered into the four online video resources most commonly accessed by orthopaedic surgery residents (VuMedi, G9MD, Orthobullets, and YouTube). Videos were captured and independently reviewed by three orthopaedic surgeons. Quality and accuracy were assessed in accordance with previously published standards. Results: Of the 39 video tutorials reviewed, 61% were rated as fair or poor. Specific maneuvers such as the Hawkins test, O'Brien sign, and Neer impingement test were accurately demonstrated in 50, 36, and 27% of videos, respectively. Inter-rater reliability was excellent (mean kappa 0.80, range 0.79-0.81). Conclusion: Our results suggest that information presented in open-access video tutorials featuring the physical examination of the shoulder is inconsistent. Trainee exposure to such potentially inaccurate information may have a significant impact on trainee education.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent

Urch¹,

Taylor²,

Cody³

et al. 2016

HSS Jrnl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This approach to quantifying reception including mean daily views is similar to that of other YouTube content analyses (e.g. Murugiah et al 2011). The reception of the videos was compared by tone and outlook.…”

Section: Receptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous research of YouTube footage has documented that there is a vast amount of health information available (e.g. Keelan et al 2007, Hussin et al 2011, Lewis et al 2011, Murugiah et al 2011, Garg et al 2015. However, there are limited investigations into road safety and driver behaviour footage (Steadman et al 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driver sleepiness on YouTube: A content analysis

Hawkins

Filtness

2017

Accident Analysis & Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Driver sleepiness is a major contributor to severe crashes and fatalities on our roads. Many people continue to drive despite being aware of feeling tired. Prevention relies heavily on education campaigns as it is difficult to police driver sleepiness. Video sharing social media site YouTube is extremely popular, particularly with at risk driver demographics. Content and popularity of uploaded videos can provide insight into the quality of publicly accessible driver sleepiness information. The purpose of this research was to answer two questions; firstly, how prevalent are driver sleepiness Driver demographic and video popularity data also was recorded. The majority of videos portrayed driver sleepiness as dangerous. However, videos that had an outlook towards driver sleepiness being amusing were viewed more often and had more mean per video comments and likes. Humorous videos regardless of outlook, were most popular. Most information regarding countermeasures to deal with driver sleepiness was accurate. Worryingly, 39.8% of videos with countermeasure information contained some kind of ineffective countermeasure. The use of humour to convey messages about the dangers of driver sleepiness may be a useful approach in educational interventions.

show abstract

“…1,[4][5][6] YouTube acts as an online video fi le repository, with the ease of access and free content being key factors in making the site popular. The use of YouTube to aid in the education of health professionals has been previously suggested.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The lack of regulatory mechanisms to vet or secure information contained within YouTube is potentially dangerous to those seeking online information. 5 Previous work in the fi eld of cardiology demonstrated multiple fl awed educational videos. 16 As such, it was hypothesised that YouTube currently hosts respiratory medicine videos of inadequate educational value.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A quality assessment of respiratory auscultation material on YouTube

Sunderland¹,

Camm²,

Glover³

et al. 2014

Clinical Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

YouTube contains a large volume of medical educational material. This study assessed the quality of respiratory auscultation videos contained in YouTube. Videos were searched for using the terms 'breath sounds', 'respiratory sounds', 'respiratory auscultation' and/or 'lung sounds'. In total, 6,022 videos were located, 36 of which were considered suitable for scoring for video accuracy, comprehensiveness and quality. The average score was 3.32/6 (55.3%±1.30). Video score correlated with time-adjusted YouTube metadata: hits per day (0.496, p=0.002) and likes per day (0.534, p=0.001). Video score also correlated with the fi rst search page on which the video was located in the 'breath sounds' and 'lung sounds' searches (-0.571, p=0.001; -0.445, p=0.014, respectively). The quality of videos was variable. Correlation between video score and some metadata values suggests that there is value for their use in judging video quality. However, the large number of videos found and inability to fi lter these results quickly makes locating educational content diffi cult.

show abstract

YouTube as a source of information on cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Cited by 164 publications

References 12 publications

The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent

The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent

Driver sleepiness on YouTube: A content analysis

A quality assessment of respiratory auscultation material on YouTube

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About