2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth With Cerebral Palsy With Differing Upper Limb Abilities: How Do They Access Computers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a tennis or stress ball may be attached to the lever of a joystick for more comfortable and satisfactory use. The idea of adaptive mass customisation is supported by Davies et al [44], who found that EAT users often employ a combination of SAT devices depending on the computer program they are accessing. This paper describes the first phase of a new design method which facilitates the involvement of professionals working in the clinical AT arena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…For example, a tennis or stress ball may be attached to the lever of a joystick for more comfortable and satisfactory use. The idea of adaptive mass customisation is supported by Davies et al [44], who found that EAT users often employ a combination of SAT devices depending on the computer program they are accessing. This paper describes the first phase of a new design method which facilitates the involvement of professionals working in the clinical AT arena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…34-35 Interfaces for accessing online information are designed for young mainstream users, and persons with sensory, physical or intellectual disabilities have difficulty with input devices and content displays. 36-37 …”
Section: Internet Use and Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, support teachers involved in social validation assessment rated as more positive the combined intervention compared to both singly proposed. Those empirical evidences are widely supported by previous studies (Davies, Chau, Fehlings, Ameratunga, & Stott, 2010;Novak et al, 2013;Oskoui, Coutinho, Dykeman, Jetté , & Pringsheim, 2013;Stasolla, Caffò , Albano, Damato, & Stella, 2013;Stasolla et al, 2013b) and allow to put forward the following considerations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%