Crucial design issues for special access technology; a Delphi study

Abstract

Purpose. To develop and demonstrate a method to involve professional users of assistive technology (AT) in the development process of customisable products. Employing the ideas of user participation and mass customisation, this research addresses the need for reduced product costs and optimised product flexibility.Method. An adaptable six-question Delphi study was developed to establish consensus among AT professionals on design issues relating to a specified AT domain requiring innovation. The study is demonstrated for the special access technology (SAT) domain. A modified morphological matrix structures the application of the study results to the product design process. 2Results. 14 Professionals from the Republic of Ireland and the UK participated. Consensus was reached on prevalent parts of SAT that malfunction, primary reasons for SAT malfunction, characteristics of clients associated with SAT selection, client needs regarding SAT use and training, desirable traits of SAT, and clinicians" frustrations with SAT.Conclusion. The study revealed a range of problems related to SAT, highlighting the complexities of successful SAT adoption. The questions led to differentiated insights and enabled design solution conceptualisation from various perspectives. The approach was found to help facilitate efficient generation and application of professional users" knowledge during the design process of customisable AT. Implications for RehabilitationHigh product costs and device abandonment negatively affect many people who use assistive technology (AT). Poor device design is a root cause of these two problems.To address this issue, a method for the practical concept generation of customisable AT is proposed and demonstrated. The method aims to support the development of new, low-cost products which satisfy a broad range of consumers' needs.The literature requests suitable methods to facilitate the involvement of different types of AT users in the product design process. This paper presents a method to first establish consensus on important design issues for a specified AT domain, and subsequently to apply these issues to the product design process. This paper describes the method"s application for a customisable special access technology (SAT) device. Crucial design issues for SAT devices are presented to assist future SAT development work in research and industry. 3This research supports and provides validation for a number of past studies about desirable criteria for AT. These studies declared that further research was required to confirm their results.

A Modified Smartphone-Based Program to Support Leisure and Communication Activities in People with Multiple Disabilities

“…Although these results appear very encouraging, general statements about the strength and usability of the program will need to wait until new research has addressed the main limitations of the present study and determined the dependability of the data reported. New research efforts may also focus on modifying the technology used in this study (Ahmed et al 2015;O'Rourke et al 2014). In essence, one could try to concentrate all functions and applications in a single smartphone, resorting to the use of applications such as MacroDroid to facilitate task automation (Zhang et al 2016;Yadav 2017).…”

Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics as a useful methodological framework for the Delphi technique

“…However, other researchers emphasized the benefit of identifying areas of disagreement through the use of Delphi (Snape et al, 2014 ; Tuominen, Tapio, Varho, Järvi, & Banister, 2014 ; Warth, von der Gracht, & Darkow, 2013 ). Other rationales provided can be broadly categorized as highlighting collaboration (Ferguson, Ireland, & Ireland, 2013 ; Munguatosha, Muyinda, & Lubega 2011 ; Nworie, 2011 ); structured group communication (Dikmen, Birgonul, Ozorhon, & Sapci, 2010 ; Keyvanfar et al, 2014 ; Manley & Zinser, 2012 ); the value of iteration and reflexivity (Ifinedo & Ifinedo, 2011 ; Loblaw et al, 2012 ; Venhorst, Zelle, Tromp, & Lauer, 2014 ); and greater democracy through anonymity (Chen, Wakeland, & Yu, 2012 ; O'Rourke et al, 2014 ; Venhorst et al, 2014 ). Only 19 articles were judged to provide some reference to a methodology, philosophy, or theoretical perspective.…”

Eye gaze technology: a South African perspective

“…The implementation of the technology in real-life situations was clearly more challenging than its use in structured assessment contexts. Problems with device implementation are not unique to resource-limited environments [8]. However, lack of financial support for the acquisition of the system precluded the families from obtaining more integrated, robust, portable systems.…”