Youth Training Programs Beyond Employment. Experimental Evidence from Argentina

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in September 2014 AbstractYouth training programs and their evaluations are ubiquitous, yet there is relatively little evidence on the mechanisms through which they operate and their effect on outcomes beyond the labor market. This is the motivation of our study of entra21 , a job training program for low income youth in Cordoba, Argentina. The program included life-skills and vocational training, as well as internships with private sector employers. Participants were allocated by means of a public lottery. We rely on detailed monthly administrative records for program participants, from which we construct a panel dataset including formal employment status, employment spells, earnings and welfare participation. These administrative records allow us to establish the effects of the program in the short term (18 months), but also -exceptionally for programs of this type in Latin America -in the medium term (36 months). The results indicate sizable gains of about 8 percentage points in formal employment in the short term (about 32% higher than the control group), although these effects tend to dissipate in the medium term. Contrary to what has been found for similar programs in the region, the effects of entra21 are substantially stronger for men, for whom the effects persist in the medium run. A dynamic analysis of employment transitions indicates that the program operates through an increase in the persistence of formal employment rather than from more frequent entries into employment. Program participants also exhibit earnings up to 50% higher than those in the control group, and an analysis of bounds indicates that these gains result from both higher employment levels and higher wages. The higher persistence and higher earnings suggest that the program was successful in increasing the human capital of participants rather than (or in addition to) providing contacts or formal intermediation. With respect to results beyond employment, women selected for the program exhibit lower levels of welfare dependencyyounger participants (aged 18 to 24) are less likely to receive child-related public cash transfers over the whole period of analysis. Finally, we present original evidence on the relationship between formal employment and consumer credit use. Program participants exhibit a higher probability of having requested consumer credit, and a higher probability of holding bank debts in good standing. These results indicate that training a...

Are we failing young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of re-engagement interventions

“…A more complex interpretation of subgroup effects emerged for gender differences, whereby, trials identified a significant effect on employment [29], a reduction in welfare receipt [30], and no short-term (i.e. <18 months) wage suppression [31] for females only.…”

“…It is worth noting, however, that intervention costs per recipient are low (e.g. $750 [29]; $1722 [30]). Although it is notoriously difficult to cost up the net social benefit of an individual moving from NEET to non-NEET status, where interventions are simple (e.g.…”

Active Labour Market Programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis

“…The remaining studies either do not find any effect -for example, the programme PROIMUJER in Uruguay (Alesina et al, 2005) -or the positive impact is confined solely to women -such as in the case of Jóvenes in Acción in Colombia (Attanasio et al, 2011). Elsewhere, other benefits associated with training programmes were identified, such as enhanced access to credit and improvements in non-cognitive skills, as in the case of Entra 21 in Argentina (Alzúa et al, 2013) and Galpão in Brazil (Calero et al, 2014), respectively -irrespective of whether these positive impacts actually improved labour market outcomes.…”

Learning Better: Public Policy for Skills Development

“…27 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have been performed and analyzed in four programs in the region: Entra21 in Argentina, three years after training; Jóvenes en Acción in Colombia, ten years after; Juventud y Empleo in the Dominican Republic, six years after; and Projoven in Peru, three years after. In general, these programs continue to have a positive impact on the quality of employment in the medium and long term (Alzúa, Cruces, and López, 2015;Attanasio et al, 2015;Kugler et al, 2015;Ibarrarán et al, 2015;Díaz and Rosas-Shady, 2016).…”