2011
DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of patient age with respect to tumour aggressiveness in men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer. In this study, we reviewed the records of 743 patients who received RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy at our institution and were followed up for .2 years postoperatively. For our analyses, the patients were divided into two groups according to age: younger (,60 years) and older (o60 years). Through uni-and multiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reports recognized advanced age as an indicator of poorer biochemical outcome [70], while others did not find any association in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy [71] or radiotherapy [72]. However, another study suggested that in high-risk younger patients, biochemical recurrence-free survival is poorer than in older patients [73]. In addition, PSA serum level was not significantly different in patients with CTC-negative and positive samples detected with the dual fluoro-EPISPOT assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some reports recognized advanced age as an indicator of poorer biochemical outcome [70], while others did not find any association in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy [71] or radiotherapy [72]. However, another study suggested that in high-risk younger patients, biochemical recurrence-free survival is poorer than in older patients [73]. In addition, PSA serum level was not significantly different in patients with CTC-negative and positive samples detected with the dual fluoro-EPISPOT assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor prognosis is reported with advanced age. [23,24] However, some studies did not find any effect at all. [25,26] In another meta-analysis study, age was not found to be a prognostic factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, they did not state why younger men with seminal vesicle invasion should have unfavorable outcomes even after controlling for tumor grade and surgical margin status. Recently, Hong et al (9) determined in their cohort that younger and older patients showed no significant differences regarding pathological parameters and BCR-free survival among all subjects who underwent RP. However, in the high-risk group, younger patients (<60 years) had a lower rate of BCR-free survival after RP compared with older patients (≥60 years) even with no significant differences observed among various known prognostic parameters between these two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%