2014
DOI: 10.1057/ejdr.2013.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Perspectives on Pastoral Rangeland Privatization: Intimate Exclusions at the Intersection of Youth Identities

Abstract: The recent privatization of Maasai rangelands in Southern Kenya has not only facilitated land grabbing by outsiders, but, more pervasively, has given rise to intimate exclusions, whereby the young generation's access to land and land-based resources has changed dramatically. Yet, young people's views and experiences are neglected in local, academic and policy debates on land tenure reform. On the basis of long-term fieldwork and mixed methods approaches in a community that has recently undergone privatization,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two opposite ways are used to achieve the second goal: to improve the management of common rangelands, policy makers most frequently promote individualization and privatization of commons, or on the contrary, the participation of rural communities in institutionalized committees. The impacts of these policies are well documented: the failure of sedentarization and intensification (Rohde et al 2006), the ambiguities of participation in common pasture management (Bary 2005;Marty 1993;Mwangi 2009;Oxby 1999) and the adverse effects of the individualization and privatization of rangelands (Archambault 2014;Benjaminsen and Sjaastad 2008;Galaty and Fratkin 1994;Lesorogol 2008). These works show that the two main goals of the advocates of livestock sedentarization, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two opposite ways are used to achieve the second goal: to improve the management of common rangelands, policy makers most frequently promote individualization and privatization of commons, or on the contrary, the participation of rural communities in institutionalized committees. The impacts of these policies are well documented: the failure of sedentarization and intensification (Rohde et al 2006), the ambiguities of participation in common pasture management (Bary 2005;Marty 1993;Mwangi 2009;Oxby 1999) and the adverse effects of the individualization and privatization of rangelands (Archambault 2014;Benjaminsen and Sjaastad 2008;Galaty and Fratkin 1994;Lesorogol 2008). These works show that the two main goals of the advocates of livestock sedentarization, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If seeking to understand gender roles and responsibilities from the actions of men and women on the ground in Elangata Wuas, you would find little support for this popular 'traditional' representation. Today, in light of the dramatic increases in school participation that have brought children who were previously herding the family livestock into the classroom, wives find themselves to be among the principal persons responsible for herding livestock (Archambault 2014). This has also been facilitated by changes in land tenure, from communal holdings to the privatisation of individual parcels, which has reduced the mobility of animals and provided women with the 'opportunity' of herding livestock close to the home while still fulfilling their many household duties.…”
Section: Setting and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When asked how, if at all, young women 3 One notable exception is Archambault (2014). 4 Importantly, this paper emphasizes the perspectives of youth on livelihoods in Turkana.…”
Section: Shifting Livelihood Desires Among Youth In Turkanamentioning
confidence: 99%