2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2011.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young firms and innovation: A microeconometric analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, as shown in Section 4, innovative ventures exhibit higher survival rates and this is particularly true when process innovation is taken into account: while product innovations may be risky and expose a newborn firm to early failure, process innovations emerge as a safe competitive driver, able to increase the chances of survival (innovation premium). Therefore, both the research investigation and the policy activities should be focused on the circumstances that facilitate the formation of innovative startups and the survival of young innovative firms (see Pellegrino et al, 2012;22 García-Quevedo et al, 2014;Czarnitzki and Delanote 2015). Some of these features are analyzed in detail in Section5.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, as shown in Section 4, innovative ventures exhibit higher survival rates and this is particularly true when process innovation is taken into account: while product innovations may be risky and expose a newborn firm to early failure, process innovations emerge as a safe competitive driver, able to increase the chances of survival (innovation premium). Therefore, both the research investigation and the policy activities should be focused on the circumstances that facilitate the formation of innovative startups and the survival of young innovative firms (see Pellegrino et al, 2012;22 García-Quevedo et al, 2014;Czarnitzki and Delanote 2015). Some of these features are analyzed in detail in Section5.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R&D is regarded as a firm's strategic decision to boost its competitive advantage in subsequent years, and decision of R&D expenditure levels involve in many different factors [20][21][22][23]. Prior studies search for the determinants that decide firms' R&D expenditure and list up non-linear relationship with size, internal and external organizations of R&D, a firm's financial capabilities, corporate structure, ownership, market structure or environment and others as the factors (e.g., [24][25][26]). …”
Section: Impact Of Related Party Transactions On Randd Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also revealed that market characteristics play a role to distinct the innovation activities of firms in different ages. Testing the link between a firm's in-house and external R&D and the firm's age, Pellegrino et al [26] found that in-house R&D is related to the product innovation in the mature and young firms together; and innovation intensity was related to the external sources only in young firms. Jensen and Meckling [27] has stated that managers tended to avoid high-risk investment, as its ownership was lower, in order to avoid private costs and enhance their personal utilities, while managerial ownership or managerial incentive can act as a determinant when defining R&D expenditure [28].…”
Section: Impact Of Related Party Transactions On Randd Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, disembodied activities, mainly based on R&D, are less frequent and usually show higher requirements for workforce qualifications and a significant correlation with employee educational attainment (Pacelli et al, 1998;Zuniga and Crespi, 2013). Actually, some works have defined TI strategies based on artefact acquisition as technological upgrading rather than innovation activities (Santamaría et al, 2009;Pellegrino et al, 2012). Therefore, the presence of different skills profiles as a part of broad, varied and balanced knowledge bases and different views increases the likelihood of carrying out disembodied TI activities.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%