1998
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.58.905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yields of short-lived fission products produced following235U(nth,f)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 92 Rb cumulative fission yield following the thermal fission of 235 U definitely merits a new measurement. While both the ENDF/B and JEFF values of 0.048 agree within 0.3%, it has been reported to be 0.074 (11) by Tipnis et al, [31], that is, 50% larger than the JEFF value, which would mean that at 5.5 MeV, 92 Rb would contribute about 30% of the total electron spectra.…”
Section: U Fast (D)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The 92 Rb cumulative fission yield following the thermal fission of 235 U definitely merits a new measurement. While both the ENDF/B and JEFF values of 0.048 agree within 0.3%, it has been reported to be 0.074 (11) by Tipnis et al, [31], that is, 50% larger than the JEFF value, which would mean that at 5.5 MeV, 92 Rb would contribute about 30% of the total electron spectra.…”
Section: U Fast (D)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A careful study of fission yields derived from observed γ-ray transitions is described by Tipnis, et al [6]. These authors used a helium-jet system to rapidly transfer fission products produced in 235 U(n th , f) reactions from a fission chamber to an HPGe detector.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similarly detailed comparison between the calculated and experimental spectra of Norman, et al is clearly unwarranted here because of the complications noted above; nonetheless, we can conclude that the general agreement is reasonable. Also, this method, coupled with accurately modeled benchmark spectra, may be very useful in assessing the general quality of the databases involved and may complement the approach described in [6]. It may also be possible to improve the quality of the evaluated data files where, at present, very large uncertainties exist.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations