1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

41
334
5
5

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 555 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
41
334
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[39][40][41][42][43] Additionally, our low measurements could be due to differences in testing methodologies, anatomic site and/or donor age. 33,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] We note that our relationship between BV/TV and elastic modulus appears weaker than that in several other studies, where 60-80% of the variability in elastic modulus is explained by volume fraction. This FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN VERTEBRAL TRABECULAR BONE MECHANICS may be due to the limited age range (and therefore bone density) of our donors compared to previously published studies, as a broader age (and density) range would likely lead to a higher correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[39][40][41][42][43] Additionally, our low measurements could be due to differences in testing methodologies, anatomic site and/or donor age. 33,34,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45] We note that our relationship between BV/TV and elastic modulus appears weaker than that in several other studies, where 60-80% of the variability in elastic modulus is explained by volume fraction. This FACTORS INFLUENCING HUMAN VERTEBRAL TRABECULAR BONE MECHANICS may be due to the limited age range (and therefore bone density) of our donors compared to previously published studies, as a broader age (and density) range would likely lead to a higher correlation coefficient.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…By design, the mean age of our donors was higher than other studies, and the age range was smaller than previous studies. 33,[39][40][41][42][43][44]46 Because we limited our sample to elderly donors, our results are not likely to be representative of the general population, but rather of an elderly population. This is important to consider when interpreting our results, as a study with a larger age range (i.e., young to old) may have different findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that dimensional scale a number of studies have investigated the relationships between trabecular and cortical bone apparent mechanical properties and their volume fraction, mineral density and microarchitecture (Kaneko et al, 2003;Kopperdahl and Keaveny, 1998;Li et al, 2013;Nyman et al, 2009;Ohman et al, 2007;Wolfram et al, 2011), by means of mechanical testing and micro computed tomography (µCT) scanning. However, little is known about the local distribution of stress and strain of bone under certain loads, information necessary to study how bone structure and its local mechanical competence are related.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterise the mechanical properties of trabecular bone previous studies have primarily relied on uniaxial compression testing of representative samples of trabecular bone (Goldstein 1987;Røhl et al 1991;Kopperdahl and Keaveny 1998;Morgan and Keaveny 2001;Keaveny et al 1993;Keyak et al 1996). Few studies have performed confined compression testing Linde and Hvid 1989;Charlebois et al 2010a) or multiaxial compression testing (Fenech and Keaveny 1999;Keaveny et al 1999;Rincon-Kohli and Zysset 2009) although trabecular bone is naturally constrained in vivo by the surrounding 6 cortex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%