2018
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392018000200299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in soybean genotypes across years

Abstract: The search for productive and stable genotypes is the main goal of breeding programs. The Genotype × Environment interaction strongly influences genotype performance, and makes the selection of new cultivars difficult. One way to take advantage of this interaction is to identify genotypes with high grain yield (GY) and stability in different environments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the consistency of correlation between GY and stability evaluation methods in multi-environment trials and identi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, (Shahbazi, 2019;Vaezi et al, 2018) HMGV, RPGV and HMRPGV selected G10 and G2 as the most stable genotypes and these genotypes are the top two genotypes in the yield rank. Hence, these BLUP based stability indexes, which are also positively and signi cantly correlated (P < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S4) with the yield rank, are best stability measures to identify high yielding and stable genotypes and this result concurs with the studies of many authors (Gonçalves et al, 2020;Milioli et al, 2018;Rosado et al, 2019) Both S (3) and S (6) selected similar genotypes as the top two stable and least two unstable con rming that they are similar in selecting stable genotypes. S (2) selected G5 as the most unstable genotypes and this is in contrary to S (1) , which declared this genotypes as the most stable one.…”
Section: Yield Stability Of Sun Ower Genotypessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For this reason, (Shahbazi, 2019;Vaezi et al, 2018) HMGV, RPGV and HMRPGV selected G10 and G2 as the most stable genotypes and these genotypes are the top two genotypes in the yield rank. Hence, these BLUP based stability indexes, which are also positively and signi cantly correlated (P < 0.001) (Supplementary Table S4) with the yield rank, are best stability measures to identify high yielding and stable genotypes and this result concurs with the studies of many authors (Gonçalves et al, 2020;Milioli et al, 2018;Rosado et al, 2019) Both S (3) and S (6) selected similar genotypes as the top two stable and least two unstable con rming that they are similar in selecting stable genotypes. S (2) selected G5 as the most unstable genotypes and this is in contrary to S (1) , which declared this genotypes as the most stable one.…”
Section: Yield Stability Of Sun Ower Genotypessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our results suggest that some genotypes had stable plant height and grain yield performance based on more than one parameter, but their rankings differed with each parameter. This implies that the comparisons may greatly depend on the parameter used as also observed by Milioli et al [59] and Westcott [60] and thus more than one parameter should be used to characterize and explore performance of genotypes across environments and enable more reliable selection and recommendation of genotypes [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the bean genotypes that were ranked as stable by ASV had very low yield, this is because stability doesn't care about high or low yielding genotypes [ 35 ]. Thus yield stability index (YSI) was used to identify high seed yielding and stable bean genotypes, as it combines both stability and high yielding traits into a single index, that is used in the selection of genotypes [ 29 , 34 ]. Genotypes with lower YSI are more useful as they have high mean yield and stability traits [ 28 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%