1993
DOI: 10.2307/3578610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield of Strand Breaks as a Function of Scavenger Concentration and LET for SV40 Irradiated with 4 He Ions

Abstract: We have measured by gel electrophoresis the yields of single- and double-strand breaks (SSBs and DSBs) induced in aqueous solutions of SV40 DNA and the SV40 minichromosome by 137Cs gamma rays (mean LET 0.3 keV micron-1) and 4He ions (mean LETs 85, 102, and 152 keV microns-1). DNA SSBs are caused mainly by the hydroxyl radicals under these conditions and are reduced in yield as either the hydroxyl radical scavenger concentration or the LET is increased (over the range studied). The G(SSB) for 4He ion irradiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
0
10

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
12
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The original level of SSBs at zero dosage is negligible, therefore, this straight line can be well fitted by SSB=kD with D representing the radiation dose. The above result supports the assumption of SSB induction being due to the one-hit event of • OH radicals [17,18]. Figure 1 also shows that the induction of DSBs is a linear-quadratic function of radiation dose and can be well fitted by DSB=αD+βD 2 , where α is the number of DSBs per unit dose induced in one irradiation event and β the number of DSB per unit squared dose induced by the combination of two independent SSB.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The original level of SSBs at zero dosage is negligible, therefore, this straight line can be well fitted by SSB=kD with D representing the radiation dose. The above result supports the assumption of SSB induction being due to the one-hit event of • OH radicals [17,18]. Figure 1 also shows that the induction of DSBs is a linear-quadratic function of radiation dose and can be well fitted by DSB=αD+βD 2 , where α is the number of DSBs per unit dose induced in one irradiation event and β the number of DSB per unit squared dose induced by the combination of two independent SSB.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…If at a very high σ value such as 10 10 s -1 , αDSB is induced only by the direct effect of irradiation energy deposition [2,17], then G dir (αDSB), the yield of αDSBs induced by the direct effect, equals about 3.4×10 8 µmol J -1 obtained earlier in a 37.5 µg ml -1 pBR322 solution [8]. Figure 3 shows that at this DNA concentration, G(αDSB) equals 2.6×10 -6 µmol J -1 , thus G dir (αDSB) occupies only a very small part of G(αDSB) so that it can be neglected.…”
Section: Estimate Of Rate Constant For αDsb Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a, we get an average number of  = (0.054 ± 0.012) DSBs/(MbpGy). This result is in the expected range and consistent with the findings of Jones et al [36]. They found a value of  = 0.052 DSBs/(MbpGy).…”
Section: Experimental Data and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The yield of multiple MN exceeds what is expected if the observed MN at each dose level follows a Poisson distribution (Table 1). It is tempting to relate the production of multiple MN to the expression of locally multiple damage sites (Ward 1981;Jones et al 1993). Alternatively, this finding may be the simple expression of severe chromosomal damage sustained by a fraction of the cell population, even at low doses, whereas other ceils may not be damaged at all.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%