We have measured the yield of single-strand breaks (SSBs), induced by 137Cs gamma radiation as assayed by agarose gel electrophoresis, for three plasmids and SV40 DNA irradiated in aerobic aqueous solution. DNA SSBs are caused mainly by the hydroxyl radical under these conditions. To characterize the reactivity of DNA with the hydroxyl radical, we investigated the variation of the G value for SSBs [G(SSB)] with the concentration of added hydroxyl radical scavengers. We find that simple competition kinetics does not describe our results, but that a nonhomogeneous kinetics model is in good agreement. At a DNA concentration of 50 micrograms cm-3, G(SSB) for the direct effect is about 1 x 10(-5) mumol J-1 for the DNA substrates studied. This is equivalent to 2 x 10(-10) SSB Gy-1 Da-1. Estimates of the efficiency of SSB induction per OH. radical interaction with DNA (0.32-0.44) reveal that all plasmids are essentially equal in reactivity.
In this work we have demonstrated the complex LET dependence of clustered-lesion yields, governed by interplay of the radical recombination and change in track structure. As expected, there was also a significant difference in clustered lesion yields between various radiation fields, having the same or similar LET values, but differing in nanometric track structure.
Guanyl radicals, the product of the removal of a single electron from guanine, are produced in DNA by the direct effect of ionizing radiation. We have produced guanyl radicals in DNA by using the single electron oxidizing agent (SCN)2-, itself derived from the indirect effect of ionizing radiation via thiocyanate scavenging of OH. We have examined the reactivity of guanyl radicals in plasmid DNA with the six most easily oxidized amino acids cysteine, cystine, histidine, methionine, tryptophan and tyrosine and also simple ester and amide derivatives of them. Cystine and histidine derivatives are unreactive. Cysteine, methionine, tyrosine and particularly tryptophan derivatives react to repair guanyl radicals in plasmid DNA with rate constants in the region of approximately 10(5), 10(5), 10(6) and 10(7) dm3 mol(-1) s(-1), respectively. The implication is that amino acid residues in DNA binding proteins such as histones might be able to repair by an electron transfer reaction the DNA damage produced by the direct effect of ionizing radiation or by other oxidative insults.
We present a nanodosimetric model for predicting the yield of double strand breaks (DSBs) and non-DSB clustered damages induced in irradiated DNA. The model uses experimental ionization cluster size distributions measured in a gas model by an ion counting nanodosimeter or, alternatively, distributions simulated by a Monte Carlo track structure code developed to simulate the nanodosimeter. The model is based on a straightforward combinatorial approach translating ionizations, as measured or simulated in a sensitive gas volume, to lesions in a DNA segment of one-two helical turns considered equivalent to the sensitive volume of the nanodosimeter. The two model parameters, corresponding to the probability that a single ion detected by the nanodosimeter corresponds to a single strand break or a single lesion (strand break or base damage) in the equivalent DNA segment, were tuned by fitting the model-predicted yields to previously measured double-strand break and double-strand lesion yields in plasmid DNA irradiated with protons and helium nuclei. Model predictions were also compared to both yield data simulated by the PARTRAC code for protons of a wide range of different energies and experimental DSB and non-DSB clustered DNA damage yield data from the literature. The applicability and limitations of this model in predicting the LET dependence of clustered DNA damage yields are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.