2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield components, light interception and radiation use efficiency of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in response to row spacing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand the 2013 season had close to normal growing season precipitation from June to August (119.0 mm vs 134.3 mm in long-term), but the cooler temperatures would contribute to reduced evapotranspiration, especially during July (17.1 • C vs 18.8 • C in long-term). Compared to wider row spacing, these favorable conditions would be more beneficial to plant growth for narrower row spacing, resulting in greater plant density and radiation interception hence higher yield for the narrower row spacing (Mattera et al, 2013). This suggests that a row spacing of 30 cm was optimal at Central Butte for yield and doubling row spacing to 60 cm would negatively impact yield under the conditions of this study.…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…On the other hand the 2013 season had close to normal growing season precipitation from June to August (119.0 mm vs 134.3 mm in long-term), but the cooler temperatures would contribute to reduced evapotranspiration, especially during July (17.1 • C vs 18.8 • C in long-term). Compared to wider row spacing, these favorable conditions would be more beneficial to plant growth for narrower row spacing, resulting in greater plant density and radiation interception hence higher yield for the narrower row spacing (Mattera et al, 2013). This suggests that a row spacing of 30 cm was optimal at Central Butte for yield and doubling row spacing to 60 cm would negatively impact yield under the conditions of this study.…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Few studies have compared light interception and other microclimate characteristics in crops grown in different row-spacing systems, and none have examined cluster planting. Greater light interception has been reported with narrow row spacing in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Heitholt et al, 1992) and other crops such as lucerne (Medicago sativa OPEN ACCESS L.) (Mattera et al, 2013), maize (Zea mays L.) (Liu & Song, 2012) and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) (Tarkalson et al, 2012). Gwathmey and Clement (2010) found that early canopy development (leaf area) and, consequently, early light interception was higher in ultra-narrow rows than with conventional spacing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The spike number of DRPP were 22.8% (2011-2012) and 25.5% (2012-2013) higher than those of SRPP, but the 1000-kernel weight were 1.4% (2011-2012) and 9.1% (2012-2013) lower in DRPP than those of SRPP, respectively (Table 2). Meanwhile, under rainfed conditions, the kernel number per spike and 1000-kernel weight of DRPP were higher than that of SRPP in 2011-2012, and the kernel number per spike and 1000-kernel weight were not significantly different between SRPP and DRPP in 2012-2013(p > 0.05). However, in 2011-2012and 2012-2013, the spike numbers of DRPP were 6.9% and 22.8% higher than those of SRPP, and the grain yields were significantly higher (by 11.3% and 11.0%) than that of SRPP, respectively (p ≤ 0.05).…”
Section: Grain Yield and Yield Componentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Meanwhile, cultivation methods have become increasingly more relevant in dealing with drought. Row spacing is an agronomic practice that affects the canopy structure, light interception, radiation use efficiency, and biomass production in some plants (ACRECHE et al, 2009;MATTERA et al, 2013). The main factors that influence plant growth include light, water, nutrients, and weed competition (BRANT et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%