2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(02)01096-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield behavior of magnetorheological suspensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes of two or three orders of magnitude may occur in the yield stress and apparent viscosity, as well, the suspension system changes from Newtonian liquid to non-Newtonian liquid when a magnetic field was applied to MR suspensions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes of two or three orders of magnitude may occur in the yield stress and apparent viscosity, as well, the suspension system changes from Newtonian liquid to non-Newtonian liquid when a magnetic field was applied to MR suspensions [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the highly controllable damping force of the MR damper is originated from the magnetized particle chains formed in the MR fluids upon exposure at an external magnetic field Bossis et al 2002Bossis et al , 2003. The mechanism responsible for the controllable shear stress is that magnetized particle chains could be formed and could resist shear stress in the direction perpendicular to the magnetic field to some extent.…”
Section: Differential Model Based On Phase Transition Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fluids are suspension of micro sized, magnetisable particles in an appropriate carrier fluid. However, in the presence of an applied magnetic field, the iron particles acquire a dipole moment aligned with the external field which causes particles to form linear chains parallel to the field (De Gans et al, 1999;Chin et al, 1999;Kordonskii et al, 1999;Bica, 2006a;Bombard et al, 2007;Pu et al, 2006;Bossis et al, 2003) as shown in the Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%