2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11540-018-9361-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and Quality Response of Two Potato Cultivars to Nitrogen Fertilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Losavio et al also reported no significant effect of N fertilization on tuber yield by Jerusalem artichoke [16,35]. This is also in accordance with Maltas et al, who reported increasing tuber yields of potatoes with increasing N fertilization, but no significant differences in the higher N rates of about 120 kg N ha −1 under comparable climatic conditions [21]. In general, the expected mineralization in the soil of the present study was quite high.…”
Section: Tuber Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Losavio et al also reported no significant effect of N fertilization on tuber yield by Jerusalem artichoke [16,35]. This is also in accordance with Maltas et al, who reported increasing tuber yields of potatoes with increasing N fertilization, but no significant differences in the higher N rates of about 120 kg N ha −1 under comparable climatic conditions [21]. In general, the expected mineralization in the soil of the present study was quite high.…”
Section: Tuber Yieldsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PNUtES was highest for the unfertilized treatment, 0 kg N ha −1 . This is similar to several studies, which showed a decreasing amount of carbohydrates in potatoes, sugar beet, and Jerusalem artichoke [21,51,54]. Hence, the aboveground biomass seems to be particularly decisive for plant efficiency, because TNUtE D and TNUtE S did not show any significant differences.…”
Section: Indicators For Plant Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations