2000
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-9288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield and Costs of Screening Growth-Retarded Infants for Torch Infections

Abstract: Many infants with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) are screened for TORCH infections. The yield and costs of such a practice may not be justifiable. Medical charts of infants with IUGR who had a workup for toxoplasmosis, other (infections), rubella, cytomegalovirus (infection), and herpes (simplex) (titer) (TORCH) infections were reviewed for the presence of clinical findings, laboratory and head ultrasound abnormalities associated with intrauterine infections. Maternal charts and reports of placental pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is only with the availability of such data that the significant human and economic cost of intrauterine deaths can be reduced. 164 …”
Section: Significance Of Infection Related Congenital Abnormalities mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is only with the availability of such data that the significant human and economic cost of intrauterine deaths can be reduced. 164 …”
Section: Significance Of Infection Related Congenital Abnormalities mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This screening protocol is most often used to identify pregnant mothers at risk of transmitting viral or protozoan infections in utero to the fetus or to evaluate newborns presenting with nonspecific, unexplained symptoms thought to be due to infection. Although TORCH infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (6), the implementation of widespread TORCH screening programs has been questioned due to several factors, including (i) potential overuse, (ii) lack of consistent and reliable serologic methods, (iii) cost, and (iv) misinterpretation of results (1,8,12,16). For example, the presence of TORCH IgG class antibodies in the mother does not differentiate between past exposure (i.e., low risk of congenital infection) and recent, acute infection (i.e., increased risk of congenital infection).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, all infection agents are risk for people including TORCH group. In this study, the prevalence of 3.664 suspected blood samples in a manner of TORCH was examined during one year period from January 1999 to January 2000 (2,14,15,18,22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%