Year, Region, and Temperature Effects on the Quality of Minnesota's Soybean Crop

Naeve, Seth L.; Huerd, Sheri C.

doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0204

Cited by 30 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It should be noted that genetic improvement during the last 35 yr may be the reason for the discrepancy regarding the protein response to temperature. Similar results were observed by Naeve and Huerd (2008), who found that oil concentrations increased due to increasing temperature during seed fill in Minnesota. No effect on protein was observed in their study.…”

Section: Temperature × Maturity Group Effectssupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Wolf et al (1982) reported increased protein and oil content, increased oleic acid, and decreased linolenic and linoleic acids as the temperature during seed fill was increased. More recently, Naeve and Huerd (2008) collected field grain samples from different growing regions within Minnesota and found that oil concentrations increased by 6.6 g kg -1 o C -1 during seed fill, but protein was not affected. The temperature during seed fill explained more variation in oil content than a specific year did.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core Ideas Planting date and maturity group decisions can greatly affect yield and composition. Temperature had a significant effect on seed yield and composition. Planting date × maturity group should be chosen based on the product's end use. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production has greatly increased in the upper U.S. Midwest over the last decade, but little information exists regarding the interactive effects of environment and spring management decisions on soybean seed yield and composition. Our objective was to assess the effect of four planting dates (PDs), four cultivar maturity groups (MGs), and ambient temperature between R5 to R8 (T5–T8) on soybean seed yield and composition. Field studies were established between 2014 and 2016 at three locations in Wisconsin and one in Minnesota. Across environmental conditions and management decisions, greater seed yield was positively correlated with protein and oil contents but negatively correlated with linoleic, linolenic, and sucrose contents. Multivariate data analysis showed positive synergies between early planting (late April–early May) and MG 2 for yield, oil, and oleic acid across the examined region. A MG 2 was the highest yielding and a ∼1200 kg ha−1 yield difference was observed between early and late PDs. These results underline the complexity of the soybean yield‐composition relationships. Additionally, the large variability in the responses of constituents to management decisions and temperature variations highlights the importance of a producer knowing the product's end use (e.g., high yield vs. high protein) and accordingly modifying the growing environment by selecting an appropriate PD and MG for the respective region. To provide more accurate recommendations to a broader range of producers, multi‐environment studies are imperative to capture large environmental variability in important soybean production areas across the United States.

show abstract

Section: Temperature × Maturity Group Effectssupporting

confidence: 88%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…seed fi ll. Moreover, Naeve and Huerd (2008) found a significant positive linear response of oil + protein to temperature during the seed-fi lling period in farm-fi eld samples in Minnesota. These apparently confl icting results highlight the great complexity of the environmental variables that determine the protein concentration, which could also probably increase interactions, generating different mega-environments, with the consequent opportunity for specifi c adaptations (Dardanelli et al, 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Water Deficit Effect on the Relationship between Temperature during the Seed Fill Period and Soybean Seed Oil and Protein Concentrations

Carrera

Martínez²,

Dardanelli³

et al. 2009

Crop Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since most soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] seed is processed into meal and oil, there is a growing concern about environmental effects on soybean seed composition. The aim of this work was to investigate how water deficit affects the well‐known relationship of soybean seed oil and protein concentrations with temperature and, alternatively, with solar radiation during seed fill. We analyzed oil and protein data from multienvironment trials in Argentina (latitude 29° to 38° S). Multiple linear regressions were used to test the effect of water deficit on the relationship between oil, protein, and oil + protein and temperature. The functions relating oil and protein concentrations with average daily mean temperature during seed fill (TmR5R7) changed with water deficit. When precipitation minus potential evapotranspiration during the reproductive period (pp‐PETR1R7) was lower than 70 mm, oil increased linearly with increasing TmR5R7 and with rising water deficit. Meanwhile, protein increased linearly with TmR5R7 but decreased linearly with water deficit. Oil + protein concentration held a linear relationship with TmR5R7 even under water deficit. Cumulative solar radiation during seed fill predicts seed quality but shows lower significance than TmR5R7 This research demonstrates that a water‐stress indicator (pp‐PETR1R7) should be considered in rainfed crops because it affects the well‐known relationship of soybean seed oil and protein concentrations with temperature.

show abstract

“…After the joint analysis of the experiments, analyses of environmental stratification and of adaptability and stability of genotypes were performed according to the following methods: Wricke (1965), Annicchiarico (1992), Lin & Binns (1988) modified by Cruz & Carneiro (2003), and centroid (Nascimento et al, 2009). The proportions of simple and complex mean squares for the interaction between genotypes and pairs of environments (MSGxEjj') were calculated according to Robertson (1959) and Cruz & Castoldi (1991).…”

Section: Fortymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The differential response of soybean genotypes to changes in environments is often evaluated by estimating the interaction effects of genotypes x locations, genotypes x years, genotypes x locations x years, and genotypes x sowing dates, although these effects are complex and the biological meaning of the contrasts is hard to explain biologically (Albrecht et al, 2008;Naeve & Huerd, 2008;Zhe et al, 2010;Barbosa et al, 2011). After estimating the interaction effects, genotype performance against environmental variations should be evaluated by analyses of adaptability and stability, which allow for identifying cultivars with predictable or responsive behavior to environmental variations, in specific or broad conditions (Cruz & Carneiro, 2003).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biometric analysis of protein and oil contents of soybean genotypes in different environments

Rodrigues

Arruda

Cruz

et al. 2014

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this work was to identify by biometric analyses the most stable soybean parents, with higher oil or protein contents, cultivated at different seasons and locations of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Forty-nine genotypes were evaluated in the municipalities of Viçosa, Visconde do Rio Branco, and São Gotardo, in the state of Minas Gerais, from 2009 to 2011. Protein and oil contents were analyzed by infrared spectrometry using a FT-NIR analyzer. The effects of genotype, environment, and genotype x environment interaction were significant. The BARC-8 soybean genotype is the best parent to increase protein contents in the progenies, followed by BR 8014887 and CS 3032PTA276-3-4. Selection for high oil content is more efficient when the crossings involve the Suprema, CD 01RR8384, and A7002 genotypes, which show high mean phenotypic values, wide adaptability, and greater stability to environmental variation.

show abstract

Year, Region, and Temperature Effects on the Quality of Minnesota's Soybean Crop

Cited by 30 publications

References 23 publications

Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition

Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition

Water Deficit Effect on the Relationship between Temperature during the Seed Fill Period and Soybean Seed Oil and Protein Concentrations

Biometric analysis of protein and oil contents of soybean genotypes in different environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About