2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2020.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

YAP and TAZ Are Not Identical Twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
94
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…extracellular rigidity (Dupont et al 2011;Dupont 2016;Pocaterra et al 2020). Although TAZ and YAP are paralogs with functional redundancy and tumor-promoting effects (Kim 2019), it is clear that TAZ and YAP play distinctively essential roles in normal tissue development and homeostasis (Yu et al 2015;Reggiani et al 2020). We clarify the The essential role of TAZ in normal tissue homeostasis genetic and protein structural features of TAZ and further highlight its biological functions in normal tissue differentiation from stem cells and in the regulation of tissue homeostasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…extracellular rigidity (Dupont et al 2011;Dupont 2016;Pocaterra et al 2020). Although TAZ and YAP are paralogs with functional redundancy and tumor-promoting effects (Kim 2019), it is clear that TAZ and YAP play distinctively essential roles in normal tissue development and homeostasis (Yu et al 2015;Reggiani et al 2020). We clarify the The essential role of TAZ in normal tissue homeostasis genetic and protein structural features of TAZ and further highlight its biological functions in normal tissue differentiation from stem cells and in the regulation of tissue homeostasis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Many transcription factors, including Runt-related transcription factors (RUNXs), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), TEADs, SMADs, ErbB-4, and p73 are known to interact with the WW domain in TAZ or YAP (Strano et al 2001;Ferrigno et al 2002;Komuro et al 2003;Zhao et al 2009). Since TAZ contains a single WW domain unlike two WW domains in YAP, its interaction with TEAD is structurally different from TEAD-YAP (Kaan et al 2017;Reggiani et al 2020). TAZ can be distinguished from YAP by its interactions with many P-rich proteins and functions within the cells.…”
Section: Structural Features Of Tazmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual dissection of YAP and TAZ (both as individual proteins and comparing them as paralogs) is key, because prior literature has shown many conflicting roles for these proteins in cell fate changes, both in self-renewal vs. differentiation and survival vs. cell death [21], whereas other processes like cell motility and regulation by the cytoskeleton seem to show more consensus. It also remains controversial whether they are functionally redundant or fulfill unique roles [22]. Stem cells and cancer are relevant systems for this undertaking, as they share capacity for differentiation and self-renewal as well as similar signaling pathways [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The main function of the Hippo pathway is to negatively regulate the activity of the transcription coactivator Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP, encoded by YAP1) and its paralog, transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ, encoded by WWTR1) (Figure 1). YAP and TAZ have many similarities in their structures, functions and regulations, yet they are not completely redundant ( 6,7 ; and reviewed in 8 ). In this review, we use the term YAP/TAZ when it has been shown that YAP and TAZ share the mentioned regulations or functions.…”
Section: Canonical Hippo Pathway Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%