1994
DOI: 10.1016/0169-4332(94)90080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPS study of clean metal sulfide surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

18
59
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 175 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
18
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, no clear distinction in the kinetic energies of the Auger peak position for copper in chalcocite Cu 2 S and that for metallic Cu [Cu(0)] could be made in our samples. For the roxbyite film obtained after 25 min, the Cu L 3 M 45 M 45 peak was observed at a kinetic energy of 917.82 eV, which agreed well with the kinetic energy reported for the roxbyite phase [20]. For the covellite film obtained after 35 min, the Cu L 3 M 45 M 45 peak was observed at a kinetic energy of 918.15 eV, which agreed well with the kinetic energy reported for the covellite phase [21,29,33] spectra, an observation that is useful for detailed analysis with the aim of differentiating various copper sulfide phases spectroscopically.…”
Section: Film Composition and Chemical Environment: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, no clear distinction in the kinetic energies of the Auger peak position for copper in chalcocite Cu 2 S and that for metallic Cu [Cu(0)] could be made in our samples. For the roxbyite film obtained after 25 min, the Cu L 3 M 45 M 45 peak was observed at a kinetic energy of 917.82 eV, which agreed well with the kinetic energy reported for the roxbyite phase [20]. For the covellite film obtained after 35 min, the Cu L 3 M 45 M 45 peak was observed at a kinetic energy of 918.15 eV, which agreed well with the kinetic energy reported for the covellite phase [21,29,33] spectra, an observation that is useful for detailed analysis with the aim of differentiating various copper sulfide phases spectroscopically.…”
Section: Film Composition and Chemical Environment: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This showed that the Cu 2p XPS core-level spectrum was not sufficiently sensitive to distinguish between the monovalent [Cu(I)] and metallic [Cu(0)] states of copper in our sample because of the similar binding energies of these two states [30]. For the sample sulfurized for 25 min, peak fitting revealed the presence of a well-defined peak with the Cu 2 p 3/2 binding energy located at 932.5 eV, which agreed well with the Cu 2 p 3/2 binding energy reported for the monovalent state of copper in roxbyite Cu 7 S 4 [20]. Note that this binding energy was 0.2 eV lower than that of the chalcocite Cu 2 S in the sample sulfurized for 20 min.…”
Section: Film Composition and Chemical Environment: Xps Analysissupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The good agreement with the literature values supports the high purity of our metal chalcogenide nanostructures. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] The size and morphology of the metal chalcogenide nanostructures are characterized by TEM in Figure 3. The particle size distribution of each sample, counted from 200 particles, is presented in Figure S5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[55,56]. The higher energy peak may have originated from S 2 2− in disulfides such as CuS 2 or FeS 2 [57], of which FeS 2 may be pyrite fines adsorbed on the gold surface whilst CuS 2 may occur as an ammonia copper(I) polysulfide [21]. Obviously, the intensity and area of peak in the presence of pyrite was much stronger and larger than that in the presence of quartz, indicating that the increased quantity of sulfur element on gold surfaces.…”
Section: Effect Of Pyrite On Gold Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%