2022
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.202200162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XPEEM and MFM Imaging of Ferroic Materials

Abstract: The authors describe and compare two complementary techniques that are habitually used to image ferromagnetic and ferroelectric materials with sub‐micron spatial resolutions (typically 50 nm, at best 10 nm). The first technique is variable‐temperature photoemission electron microscopy with magnetic/antiferromagnetic/polar contrast from circularly/linearly polarized incident X‐rays (XPEEM). The second technique is magnetic force microscopy (MFM). Focusing mainly on the authors’ own work, but not exclusively, pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous work has utilized X-ray magnetic circular dichroism PEEM (XMCD-PEEM) to reconstruct the spatially resolved magnetization vector, by combining images taken at different relative X-ray/sample orientations (Le Guyader et al, 2012;Ruiz-Go ´mez et al, 2018;Ghidini et al, 2022;Scholl et al, 2002;Chopdekar et al, 2013;Chmiel et al, 2018;Digernes et al, 2020). Here, we perform a detailed investigation of how the quality of the reconstructed 3D magnetization vector changes depending on the number of projections involved and their angular distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has utilized X-ray magnetic circular dichroism PEEM (XMCD-PEEM) to reconstruct the spatially resolved magnetization vector, by combining images taken at different relative X-ray/sample orientations (Le Guyader et al, 2012;Ruiz-Go ´mez et al, 2018;Ghidini et al, 2022;Scholl et al, 2002;Chopdekar et al, 2013;Chmiel et al, 2018;Digernes et al, 2020). Here, we perform a detailed investigation of how the quality of the reconstructed 3D magnetization vector changes depending on the number of projections involved and their angular distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we show how PD-PEEM can image the AFE domains of β′-In 2 Se 3 on the nanoscale by directly measuring the energy-and polarization-dependent transition dipole moment (TDM). Previous PEEM studies have successfully imaged ferroelectric and ferromagnetic domains, but these studies have relied on x-ray and ultraviolet excitation to induce single-photon photoemission (PE), rather than probing optical transitions as in this work, and to date, those methods have not been used to resolve AFE domains (24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Despite having zero net permanent dipole, the small atomic distortions that give rise to the AFE nature of β′-In 2 Se 3 lead to electronic structure modifications that can be observed with PD-PEEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we show how PD-PEEM can image the AFE domains of β ′ -In 2 Se 3 on the nanoscale by directly measuring the energy-and polarization-dependent transition dipole moment. Previous PEEM studies have successfully imaged ferroelectric and ferromagnetic domains, but these studies have relied on X-ray and extreme UV excitation to access core levels and do not probe optical transitions as in this work [29][30][31][32]. Despite having zero net permanent dipole, the small atomic distortions that give rise to the AFE nature of β ′ -In 2 Se 3 lead to 1, fit to each pixel in the PD-PEEM data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%