2021
DOI: 10.1080/02589001.2020.1853686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Xenophobia: scale development and validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents the summary of the scales on xenophobia in the international literature. Xenophobia Scale Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) Xenophobia Scale…”
Section: Measuring Xenophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 presents the summary of the scales on xenophobia in the international literature. Xenophobia Scale Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021) Xenophobia Scale…”
Section: Measuring Xenophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Likert scale developed by Hague (2015) consists of six items (cited in Bozdağ & Kocatürk, 2017). The scale developed by Olonisakin and Adebayo (2021), on the other hand, does not confine the groups in which the individual may display xenophobia to immigrants, aliens or foreigners from other countries; handles the concept of xenophobia from a much broader perspective taking into account religion, ethnic grouping and other cultural elements in a society.…”
Section: Measuring Xenophobiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Olonisakin ( 2019) reported a Cronbach's alpha of .84. This measure is positively associated with a tendency to justify the system (Olonisakin, 2019) and harsh social attitudes such as ingroup-centeredness and ingroup exclusivity (Olonisakin & Adebayo, 2021).…”
Section: Sdomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, religious and genetic theories which appeal to the moral and intellectual justification of group-based inequality (Pratto et al, 1994;Pratto et al, 2006) Social attitudes that favour discrimination and the outcomes they facilitate are the channels through which inequalities are maintained in societies. Such attitudes are likely to lead to the support of policies, processes, structures, and institutions that help to institutionalise and perpetuate oppression and discrimination (Olonisakin & Adebayo, 2021;Pratto et al, 2006). In an environment that requires cooperation, healthy competition, tolerance, and trust such as a university environment, these attitudes are likely to produce negative outcomes in social interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%