2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12920-021-00872-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

XenoCell: classification of cellular barcodes in single cell experiments from xenograft samples

Abstract: Background Single-cell sequencing technologies provide unprecedented opportunities to deconvolve the genomic, transcriptomic or epigenomic heterogeneity of complex biological systems. Its application in samples from xenografts of patient-derived biopsies (PDX), however, is limited by the presence of cells originating from both the host and the graft in the analysed samples; in fact, in the bioinformatics workflows it is still a challenge discriminating between host and graft sequence reads obta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xenocell version 1.0 (ref. 86 ) was used to classify reads between host (mouse) and graft (human). The bollito pipeline 87 was used to perform read analysis as follows: sequencing quality was checked with FastQC ( http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ ); reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh38_p13 from GENCODE 88 ) with STARsolo (STAR 2.7.3a (ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xenocell version 1.0 (ref. 86 ) was used to classify reads between host (mouse) and graft (human). The bollito pipeline 87 was used to perform read analysis as follows: sequencing quality was checked with FastQC ( http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ ); reads were aligned to the human reference genome (GRCh38_p13 from GENCODE 88 ) with STARsolo (STAR 2.7.3a (ref.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The errors were not identical across tissues or cell types, and some cells had > 10% of reads misaligned to genes of other species. Due to misalignment, cross-species doublet identification via read count or read majority [ 5 , 8 ] may lead to inaccurate calls. In addition, ambient RNA from other species can generate strong false-positive signals, which may disturb downstream analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error were not identical across tissues or cell types, and few cells had more than 10% of reads misaligned to the other species. Due to misalignment, cross-species doublet identification via read count or by read percentage 5,21 may lead to inaccurate calls. Also ambient RNA from other species generate strong false positive signals and may disturb downstream analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmony [30] was used to remove batch effect from mixed and separately sequenced libraries. Cell type was identified by the consensus of scHCL correlation for each cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation