X und Motif

Gottheil, Klaus; Kaufmann, Hermann-Josef; Kern, Thomas; Zhao, Rui

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-77308-2

“…Tested GUI libraries (e.g., Motif, Qt, Mac OSX): Here we note which graphical user interface libraries are discussed in association with each graphics toolkit. In addition to Motif (Xt) [16,17], Trolltech's Qt [18,59] (www.trolltech.com ), and Win32 [20,23], OIM provides DialogViz-a C++ class library that extends Open Inventor by adding cross-platform GUI support [22]. Interestingly, we did not find any mention of the open source GUI library we currently use, namely, FOX (www.fox-toolkit.org).…”

Section: Application Programming Featuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing and evaluating computer graphics and visualization software

Laramee

¹

2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When starting a new computer graphics or visualization software project, students, researchers, and businesses alike must decide whether or not to start from scratch or with third party software. Since computer graphics and visualization applications are typically quite large, developers often build upon existing software libraries in order to take advantage of the tens of thousands of hours worth of development and testing already invested. Thus developers and managers must face the decision of which library to build on. We present a side-by-side comparison and evaluation of four popular, state of the art visualization and computer graphics libraries, namely the Visualization Toolkit, Open Inventor, Coin3D, and Hoops 3D. The evaluation is based on the feature set, ease of installation, development of a benchmark application, documentation, and technical support for each package. The results of our comparison and evaluation are described and recommendations are given as for whom the libraries are best suited. The Visualization Toolkit prevails on top in many of the aspects we compared and evaluated.

show abstract

Untitled

Chen

¹

,

Wei²,

Delis

³

2008

Softw Pract Exp

1

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When starting a new computer graphics or visualization software project, students, researchers, and businesses alike must decide whether or not to start from scratch or with third party software. Since computer graphics and visualization applications are typically quite large, developers often build upon existing software libraries in order to take advantage of the tens of thousands of hours worth of development and testing already invested. Thus developers and managers must face the decision of which library to build on. We present a side-by-side comparison and evaluation of four popular, state of the art visualization and computer graphics libraries, namely the Visualization Toolkit, Open Inventor, Coin3D, and Hoops 3D. The evaluation is based on the feature set, ease of installation, development of a benchmark application, documentation, and technical support for each package. The results of our comparison and evaluation are described and recommendations are given as for whom the libraries are best suited. The Visualization Toolkit prevails on top in many of the aspects we compared and evaluated.

show abstract

Benutzeroberflächen

Brause¹

2017

Betriebssysteme

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

X und Motif

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Comparing and evaluating computer graphics and visualization software

Comparing and evaluating computer graphics and visualization software

Untitled

Benutzeroberflächen

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About