2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1063776114120176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-shaped and Y-shaped Andreev resonance profiles in a superconducting quantum dot

Abstract: The quasi-bound states of a superconducting quantum dot that is weakly coupled to a normal metal appear as resonances in the Andreev reflection probability, measured via the differential conductance. We study the evolution of these Andreev resonances when an external parameter (such as magnetic field or gate voltage) is varied, using a random-matrix model for the N × N scattering matrix. We contrast the two ensembles with broken time-reversal symmetry, in the presence or absence of spin-rotation symmetry (clas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Our central result expands and substantially generalizes on the generic class D "sticking ZBCP" [35] scenario -i.e., a non-quantized conductance peak that remains at zero bias as a single continuous parameter is tuned (this was also called a "Y-shaped Andreev resonance" in Ref. 35).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Our central result expands and substantially generalizes on the generic class D "sticking ZBCP" [35] scenario -i.e., a non-quantized conductance peak that remains at zero bias as a single continuous parameter is tuned (this was also called a "Y-shaped Andreev resonance" in Ref. 35).…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…Zeeman field, gate voltages, tunnel barrier) in a systematic way is practically guaranteed to produce these "false positive" apparently quantized, but nevertheless trivial, ZBCPs. Our theoretical starting point is a class D random matrix ensemble [31,[33][34][35]. The model is maximally generic, since we impose no constraint other than particle-hole symmetry on the Hamiltonian, which holds for every experimental Majorana platform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the scattering region is additionally strongly coupled to a normal lead, a persistent zero-bias peak in the Andreev conductance is formed [43][44][45]. In our case, we expect such a peak to develop in the presence of a discrete vortex, and to disappear in its absence.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These states are thus no longer orthogonal to each other, and the spin-orbit mediated overlap between them causes energy splitting, leading to level repulsion [40][41][42]. This level repulsion, which is generic in class D systems in the presence of superconductivity, magnetic field and spin-orbit coupling [43,44], can be extracted from the low energy nanowire spectrum as measured by tunneling spectroscopy [45].…”
Section: Level Repulsion Due To Spin-orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%