2008
DOI: 10.1143/apex.1.065004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray Reflectivity Study on Depth Profile of Acid Generator Distribution in Chemically Amplified Resists

Abstract: In the sub-100-nm mass production of semiconductor devices, thin-film resists dispersing acid generator molecules, referred to as chemically amplified resists, have been used. Feature sizes in lithography are approaching the molecular scale with the rapid progress in miniaturization. With reductions in lateral dimensions, a decrease in resist thickness is inevitable and the effects of interfaces become significant. A requirement for ultrafine fabrication is the uniformity of resist components. In this work, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
113
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
113
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reason for the lower limit of LER is that the concentration of acid generator is finite [32]. ) [27] Thermalization distance (nm) [14] Acid generator concentration (wt%) Reaction radius of acid generator (nm) [14] Effective reaction radius for neutralization (nm) Effective reaction radius for deprotection (nm) [7] Protection ratio (%) Deprotonation efficiency of proton source [28] Deprotonation efficiency of nonproton source [15] Diffusion constant of acids (nm for the acid generator concentration of 10, 20, and 30 wt%, respectively. The maximum normalized chemical gradient can be increased, by increasing the acid generator concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main reason for the lower limit of LER is that the concentration of acid generator is finite [32]. ) [27] Thermalization distance (nm) [14] Acid generator concentration (wt%) Reaction radius of acid generator (nm) [14] Effective reaction radius for neutralization (nm) Effective reaction radius for deprotection (nm) [7] Protection ratio (%) Deprotonation efficiency of proton source [28] Deprotonation efficiency of nonproton source [15] Diffusion constant of acids (nm for the acid generator concentration of 10, 20, and 30 wt%, respectively. The maximum normalized chemical gradient can be increased, by increasing the acid generator concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective reaction radius for deprotection was set to be 0.1-0.3 nm [7]. The parameters used in the simulation are summarized in Table 1 [7,14,15,27,28].…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the electron reached a radical cation within the distance of r + , the electron was regarded to be lost through the recombination. If the electron reached an acid generator molecule within the distance of r AG , the electron was regarded to induce ) [31] Thermalization distance (nm) Acid generator concentration (wt%) Reaction radius of acid generator (nm) [22] Acid diffusion constant (nm Effective reaction radius for neutralization (nm) Effective reaction radius for deprotection (nm) Protection ratio (%) Deprotonation efficiency of proton source [32] Deprotonation efficiency of nonproton source [23] the dissociation of that acid generator molecule. r AG of TPS-Tf has been determined to be 0.70 ± 0.08 nm [22].…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective reaction radius for deprotection was changed from 0.1 to 1.0 nm. The parameters used in the simulation are summarized in Table 1 [22,23,31,32]. The other details in the reaction mechanisms have been reported elsewhere [14,33].…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhomogeneous distribution of acid generators is a serious concern in ultrafine patterning. 54,55) Therefore, the lower limit cannot be infinitely reduced by increasing the acid generator concentration. Note that acid generators capable of solubility changes are under development.…”
Section: Limit Of Lermentioning
confidence: 99%