2021
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202100089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X‐ray luminescence computed tomography using a hybrid proton propagation model and Lasso‐LSQR algorithm

Abstract: X‐ray luminescence computed tomography (XLCT) uses external X‐rays for luminescence excitation, which is becoming a promising molecular imaging technique with superb penetration depth and spatial resolution. To achieve the tomographic mapping of luminescence distribution, accurate optical propagation model and suitable reconstruction method are two keys for XLCT, but not satisfied. To overcome the limitation of the single proton propagation model (e.g., DE, SP3), we adopted a hybrid diffusion equation with thi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid diffusion equation– SP N method considered the applicability of SP N and DE models in different biological tissues, and DE was employed to describe light propagation in high-scattering tissues, while SP N was used in other tissues. This method achieved a comparable accuracy and much less computation time compared with the SP N model and a much better accuracy compared with DE as well ( 33 , 34 ). The studies of hybrid models offer ideas to the optical transmission model in our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The hybrid diffusion equation– SP N method considered the applicability of SP N and DE models in different biological tissues, and DE was employed to describe light propagation in high-scattering tissues, while SP N was used in other tissues. This method achieved a comparable accuracy and much less computation time compared with the SP N model and a much better accuracy compared with DE as well ( 33 , 34 ). The studies of hybrid models offer ideas to the optical transmission model in our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The performance of the hybrid model was validated with both regular geometries and digital mouse model, and results revealed that the HSDE model makes full use of the advantages of SP N and DE in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Subsequently, Chen et al and Wang et al applied the HSDE model as the forward imaging model for fluorescence molecular tomography (28), multispectral Cerenkov luminescence tomography (53), and X-ray luminescence computed tomography (54), respectively. The concise form of the HSDE model can be expressed as ( 29):…”
Section: Hybrid Models For Solving Different Scattering Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Wang et al. applied the HSDE model as the forward imaging model for fluorescence molecular tomography ( 28 ), multispectral Cerenkov luminescence tomography ( 53 ), and X-ray luminescence computed tomography ( 54 ), respectively. The concise form of the HSDE model can be expressed as ( 29 ):…”
Section: Light Propagation Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the former approach, one of the exploited computational techniques is the LSQR iterative algorithm, to solve large, ill-posed, overdetermined, and possibly sparse systems of equations (Paige and Saunders, 1982a,b). This algorithm is employed in several contexts, such as medicine (Bin et al, 2020;Guo et al, 2021), geophysics (Joulidehsar et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2019a,b), geodesy (Baur and Austen, 2005), industry (Jaffri et al, 2020), and astronomy (Borriello et al, 1986;Van der Marel, 1988;Naghibzadeh and van der Veen, 2017;Becciani et al, 2014;Cesare et al, 2021Cesare et al, , 2022c. For a more in-depth discussion about the LSQR algorithm and other LSQR-based applications and libraries, see Section 2 of Cesare et al (2022b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%