1974
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210250205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray diffraction in the range of two diffracted beams for extremely asymmetric case

Abstract: X‐ray diffraction phenomena are considered in a case, in which two reciprocal lattice points lie on Ewald's sphere and the angle between the crystal surface and the diffracted beam exactly fulfilling the Bragg condition is small. If this angle is small enough and the crystal is thin enough, the two diffracted beams may be observed outside the crystal. Diffraction phenomena are analysed for the case, when two diffracted waves occur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pictorial model of the appropriate dispersion surface geometry, which is discussed at length below, has been developed by Baryshevskii (1976), Andreev et al (1982 and H6che & Briimmer (1986). These dynamical treatments are similar to the earlier works on extremely asymmetric diffraction in which one of the external beams is nearly parallel to the surface, by Farwig & Shiirmann (1967), Kishino (1971), Kishino, Noda & Kohra (1972), Bedynska (1973Bedynska ( , 1974, Rustichelli (1975) and H~irtwig (1976, 1977). All of these efforts begin with the dynamical diffraction theory as originally formulated by Ewald (1916aEwald ( , b, 1917 and later reformulated by von Laue (1931), in which a perfect crystal is represented by a periodic dielectric function (Batterman & Cole, 1964).…”
Section: Dynamical Diffraction Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…A pictorial model of the appropriate dispersion surface geometry, which is discussed at length below, has been developed by Baryshevskii (1976), Andreev et al (1982 and H6che & Briimmer (1986). These dynamical treatments are similar to the earlier works on extremely asymmetric diffraction in which one of the external beams is nearly parallel to the surface, by Farwig & Shiirmann (1967), Kishino (1971), Kishino, Noda & Kohra (1972), Bedynska (1973Bedynska ( , 1974, Rustichelli (1975) and H~irtwig (1976, 1977). All of these efforts begin with the dynamical diffraction theory as originally formulated by Ewald (1916aEwald ( , b, 1917 and later reformulated by von Laue (1931), in which a perfect crystal is represented by a periodic dielectric function (Batterman & Cole, 1964).…”
Section: Dynamical Diffraction Theorysupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Starting with the work of Marra, Eisenberger & Cho (1979) a new technique was developed, the so-called X-ray surface diffraction. The dynamical treatment of these diffraction experiments was given by Afanas'ev & Melkonyan (1983) by means of the extended dynamical theory of X-ray diffraction given by Bedynska (1973Bedynska ( , 1974, Briimmer, Hibche & Nieber (1976a, b, 1979 0108-7673/86/060585-03501.50 and H/irtwig (1976,1977). The aim of this paper is the geometrical interpretation of the phenomena of X-ray surface diffraction on the basis of the three-dimensional dispersion surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement of the conservation of total energy is hence fulfilled. For extremely asymmetric reflection, for which the angle between the incident (or diffracted) beam and the crystal surface is less than 2 ° , more than two modes are permitted (Kishino & Kohra, 1971;Bedynska, 1974). For N-beam (N > 2) Borrmann diffraction, there are 2N permitted modes since only transmissions are involved and the characteristics of two-beam (Laue) transmission can be applied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%