2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2007.01.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray and gamma-ray response of a 2″×2″ LaBr3:Ce scintillation detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements included a study of resolution as a function of shaping time (Ortec DigiBases, bipolar shaping) and high voltage applied to the photomultiplier tubes, with the goal being to identify suitable instrument operating windows (Figure 7, top) [Knoll 2000]. Once we identified suitable settings , we used a series of check sources to assess the expected energy resolution (relative FWHM) as a function of energy (Figure 7, bottom), in a manner consistent with similar work by others [Moszynski 2002;Ciemala 2009;Nicolini 2007;Quarati 2007]. Due to relatively high count rates expected in the cylinder assay scenario, we made further measurements to evaluate the resolution of each detector as a function of incident count rate.…”
Section: Calibration and Characterization Of Gamma-ray Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These measurements included a study of resolution as a function of shaping time (Ortec DigiBases, bipolar shaping) and high voltage applied to the photomultiplier tubes, with the goal being to identify suitable instrument operating windows (Figure 7, top) [Knoll 2000]. Once we identified suitable settings , we used a series of check sources to assess the expected energy resolution (relative FWHM) as a function of energy (Figure 7, bottom), in a manner consistent with similar work by others [Moszynski 2002;Ciemala 2009;Nicolini 2007;Quarati 2007]. Due to relatively high count rates expected in the cylinder assay scenario, we made further measurements to evaluate the resolution of each detector as a function of incident count rate.…”
Section: Calibration and Characterization Of Gamma-ray Spectrometersmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 3 shows that the 662 keV peak is readily observed in the SrI 2 (Eu) spectrum, while the poorer energy resolution of NaI(Tl) degrades its ability to detect the source, and the intrinsic background in LaBr 3 (Ce) (La-138 gammas at 789 and 1436 keV, betas in 0-255 keV range, the Ba-138 32-37 keV x-rays, and sums of these) complicates its spectrum [11].…”
Section: Gamma Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Furthermore, LaBr 3 :Ce scintillators have large stopping power in spite of their relatively lower effective atomic number, since it is possible to make a large crystal with high density (5.3 g/cm 3 ). [9][10][11] They are also suitable for high energy gamma ray measurements (e.g., cosmic ray, characteristic gamma ray due to nuclear reactions 12 and environmental radiation 13 ). Additionally, fluorescence characteristics of LaBr 3 :Ce scintillators have only a small dependency on thermal changes 14 and have strong radiation-resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%