1995
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.52.6332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-ray-absorption fine-structure standards: A comparison of experiment and theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
169
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
10
169
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic errors for these data are expected to be about 0.005 Å in the bond length and 5% in σ and the number of neighbors. 70 Cyclopentadienes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic errors for these data are expected to be about 0.005 Å in the bond length and 5% in σ and the number of neighbors. 70 Cyclopentadienes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One double layer of each sample (sample thickness is ∼0.2 absorption lengths for Eu) was used when collecting XANES data. A pre-edge background (contribution from other edges) was subtracted for all the XANES data using standard procedures [14,15]. The step height of the main absorption edge was normalized to 1 for each of the samples and references.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown to be accurate to within ∼5% for metals. 27 Any static disorder should manifest as a constant offset, as is clearly shown, for example, for La 1−x Ca x MnO 3 . 28 The XAFS data were fit in r-space, following procedures in Ref.…”
Section: B Xafsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The XAFS data were fit in r-space, following procedures in Ref. [ 24,27]. Initial fits included a short X-Cu pair at ∼2.55Å.…”
Section: B Xafsmentioning
confidence: 99%