2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.63.054427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow crossover inYbXCu4(X=Ag, Cd, In, Mg, Tl, Zn) intermediate-valence compounds

Abstract: We compare the results of measurements of the magnetic susceptibility χ(T ), the linear coefficient of specific heat γ(T ) = C(T )/T and 4f occupation number n f (T ) for the intermediate valence compounds YbXCu 4 (X = Ag, Cd, In, Mg, Tl, Zn) to the predictions of the Anderson impurity model, calculated in the non-crossing approximation (NCA). The crossover from the low temperature Fermi liquid state to the high temperature local moment state is substantially slower in the compounds than predicted by the NCA; … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
57
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 These absolute error estimates are similar to (though always larger than) those obtained by other methods such as a Monte Carlo method 33 or the relative errors estimated from the number of scans taken at a given temperature for all the measurements report here.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…31 These absolute error estimates are similar to (though always larger than) those obtained by other methods such as a Monte Carlo method 33 or the relative errors estimated from the number of scans taken at a given temperature for all the measurements report here.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…37 The results of such fits are shown in Figure 6, and repeated for the data from Cp * 2 Yb(4,4 ′ -Me 2 -bipy)…”
Section: X-ray Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have confirmed this limit with a more detailed NCA calculation. 57 For smaller T nca , this limit would be even more restrictive. Therefore, the main conclusion of this qualitative discussion is simply that charge fluctuations dominate the interpretation of the RXES data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%