2021
DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2021.1883484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X-Band Multilayer Stacked Microstrip Antenna Using Novel Electromagnetic Band-Gap Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bandwidth of this antenna is considered narrow, and the antenna is not circularly polarized over the whole bandwidth. The eighth antenna in [9] is a multi-layered rectangular microstrip antenna, with an inset feeding technique, consisting of a 10 GHz resonating conventional microstrip patch and 9 × 9 electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) array, with a bandwidth extending from 9.42 GHz to 10.62 GHz, maximum gain of 8.5 dBi, and is not circularly polarized. The antenna size is 55×55×17.67 mm 3 (1.84λ 0 ×1.84λ 0 ×0.59λ 0 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bandwidth of this antenna is considered narrow, and the antenna is not circularly polarized over the whole bandwidth. The eighth antenna in [9] is a multi-layered rectangular microstrip antenna, with an inset feeding technique, consisting of a 10 GHz resonating conventional microstrip patch and 9 × 9 electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) array, with a bandwidth extending from 9.42 GHz to 10.62 GHz, maximum gain of 8.5 dBi, and is not circularly polarized. The antenna size is 55×55×17.67 mm 3 (1.84λ 0 ×1.84λ 0 ×0.59λ 0 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, when a high gain is required, installing an array antenna inside a CubeSat might be challenging because high gain array antennas require larger aperture size, and they would occupy beyond allocated space. To improve the gain of a single element antenna without the use of an array technique, numerous techniques have been proposed, including parasitic patches (PPs), 3 metasurface, 4 frequency selective surface (FSS), 5 artificial magnetic conductors (AMC), metamaterials, 6 electromagnetic Band‐gap structures (EBG), 7 and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particle is impacted by its current position, the best position in the swarm, and its velocity. Lately, PSO has been used to solve real-world engineering problems such as the design of multilayered rectangular microstrip antenna using electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures [29], and bandwidth improvement of an inverted-F antenna (IFA) [30]. Furthermore, the PSO algorithm is also able to design new engineering components, for example, artificial magnetic conductors [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%