1999
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<1861:lqlinc>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Muhs et al (1999a) documented spatial variation in the geochemistry and mineralogy of eolian sands across the Sand Hills, but we have not identified temporal changes in sand composition allowing differentiation of Pleistocene and Holocene deposits without OSL dating. Our cores seldom contained paleosols or other potential stratigraphic markers, probably because of frequent erosional truncation, and efforts to use ground-penetrating radar to characterize the stratigraphy within the large dunes have been unsuccessful so far.…”
Section: Geomorphological Interpretation Of the Osl Agesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Muhs et al (1999a) documented spatial variation in the geochemistry and mineralogy of eolian sands across the Sand Hills, but we have not identified temporal changes in sand composition allowing differentiation of Pleistocene and Holocene deposits without OSL dating. Our cores seldom contained paleosols or other potential stratigraphic markers, probably because of frequent erosional truncation, and efforts to use ground-penetrating radar to characterize the stratigraphy within the large dunes have been unsuccessful so far.…”
Section: Geomorphological Interpretation Of the Osl Agesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One possible way to identify local effects on PSD is to compare the spatial patterns of loess thickness and PSD over a depositional area (e.g., Muhs et al, 1999Muhs et al, , 2008Mason, 2001;Mason et al, 2003) as the trends may provide insights into sediment transport pathways or distance from the source, availability of sediment, and sedimentation rate. Furthermore, these comparisons allow wider patterns to be identified that are independent of local topographic or proximal source influences.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Northern Iranian and Global Loess Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining offset between modern and late-glacial shell δ 13 C values is most likely due to differences in the δ 13 C values of the snail diet. Generally, modern tundra, boreal forest, and coastal forest biomes in Alaska are all dominated by C 3 plants (average δ 13 C value of −26‰), which include trees and coolseason grasses and are depleted in 13 C compared with C 4 plants (average δ 13 C value of −12‰) (O 'Leary, 1988;Muhs et al, 1999Muhs et al, , 2000. C 3 and C 4 plants fractionate carbon isotopes in different ways.…”
Section: Paleo-vegetation Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…when atmospheric CO 2 concentrations were much lower than during interglacial times (Sigman and Boyle, 2000). However, it is likely that regional temperatures override this factor, with lower last glacial temperatures being more important than CO 2 in determining the relative abundance of C 3 and C 4 plants, as seen in Muhs et al (1999).…”
Section: Paleo-vegetation Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%