Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Writing in the Disciplines 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-34451-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Writing in the Disciplines: Beyond Remediality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deane and O'Neill (2011) characterise WID as the integration of writing and disciplinary knowledge, considering writing (instruction) an integral part of disciplinary induction, with content lecturers being the most knowledgeable of the generic conventions in their own fields. And yet, EMI lecturers' self-reported low English language proficiency levels hinder them from taking on the role of disciplinary language experts (e.g.…”
Section: Teaching Specialised Genresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deane and O'Neill (2011) characterise WID as the integration of writing and disciplinary knowledge, considering writing (instruction) an integral part of disciplinary induction, with content lecturers being the most knowledgeable of the generic conventions in their own fields. And yet, EMI lecturers' self-reported low English language proficiency levels hinder them from taking on the role of disciplinary language experts (e.g.…”
Section: Teaching Specialised Genresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Street (1999, 2000) imported the significance of the critical approach and disciplinary cultural socialization of EAP in addition to EAP's focus on skills. Deane and O'Neill (2011), proponents of WID (Writing in Discipline), confirm that language related to disciplines is an appropriate skill of academic writing, in a similar fashion to the view of Dudley-Evans and St John (1998) of ESAP. However, they dispute the affordance of generic skills and academic literacies.…”
Section: Debate Over Instructionsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…For instance, many EAP scholars insist on the authenticity of their disciplinary discourse; some have begun to use authentic research articles to teach EAP in a number of different disciplines, and others suggest that the subject teacher should team up with a language teacher to deliver specificity in the EAP class (Dudley-Evans, 2001;Deane & O'Neill, 2011;Wingate, 2015). However, this refers to discourse participation in pedagogical discourse (Woodward-Kron, 2002), and the potential results in terms of students' written work may differ from their writing in genuine mature discourse (Freedman & Adam, 1996).…”
Section: Under Progressivism: Language As Discourse and Eap As Discipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Disciplinary literacies have been attributed increasing importance in recent publications concerned with discipline-specific writing, reading, speaking, listening, and viewing (e.g. Deane & O'Neill, 2011;Derewianka & Jones, 2016;Flowerdew & Costley, 2016;Paltridge & Starfield, 2013). Evolving in tandem with these changes in understanding disciplinary literacies are the innovations in teaching in English-medium Instruction (EMI) and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%