‘WP2Cochrane’, a tool linking Wikipedia to the Cochrane Library: Results of a bibliometric analysis evaluating article quality and importance

Abstract

Medical information on English Wikipedia was accessed over 2 billion times in 2018. Our goal was to develop an automated system to assist Wikipedia volunteers to improve articles with high-quality sources from journals such as The Cochrane Library. We created an automated indexing system by linking available reviews from the Cochrane library with disease-related Wikipedia articles and evaluating the relationship between the quality and importance of these articles with the number of relevant and cited Cochrane reviews. We first conducted a bibliometric analysis, identifying disease-related Wikipedia articles and relevant/cited Cochrane reviews. Citations were thematically coded, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Finally, separate multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted for article quality and importance. The indexing system identified 4381 disease-related Wikipedia articles, 1193 (27%) of which cited a Cochrane review. Higher quality Wikipedia articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p = 0.002), while lower quality articles were less likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.0005). A greater number of Cochrane reviews are available for more ‘important’ Wikipedia articles (p < 0.005), and these articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane review (p < 0.005). This approach to an indexing system can be leveraged by Wikipedia contributors and editors seeking to update disease-related Wikipedia articles with relevant Cochrane reviews (thus improving their quality), and online information seekers in need of additional information to supplement their Wikipedia search.

Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

“…The WPM has formed institutional-level partnerships to provide editors with access to reputable secondary sources that are in line with the MEDRS policy on medical and health topics—namely, through its cooperation with the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Reviews database is available to Wikipedia’s medical editors, and it offers them access to systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the results of multiple medical research studies [ 39 ]. As well as the existence of this database on medical content, the practice of providing access to high-quality sources was also deployed specifically in regards to coronavirus in the form a list of “trusted” sources provided to volunteers of the task force on the WikiProject COVID-19 project page.…”

Citation needed? Wikipedia bibliometrics during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic

“…The WPM has formed institutional-level partnerships to provide editors with access to reputable secondary sources on medical and health topics -namely through its cooperation with the Cochrane Library. The Cochran Reviews' database is available to Wikipedia's medical editors and it offers them access to systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses summarizing the results of multiple medical research studies (34). As well as the existence of this database on medical content, the practice of providing access to high-quality sources was also deployed specifically in regards to coronavirus in the form of the task force's list of "trusted" sources.…”

Exploring open access coverage of Wikipedia-cited research across the White Rose Universities

“…6 More recent research, in 2019, looked at disease-related articles on Wikipedia and found that higher-quality articles were more likely to cite a Cochrane Review from the Cochrane Library than lower-quality articles on the encyclopaedia. 7 The authors used Wikipedia's definition of 'higherquality articles' as those that have inline citations from reliable sources.…”