1995
DOI: 10.1097/00004630-199505000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wound Healing in Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds Treated With Collagenase Ointment Versus Silver Sulfadiazine Cream

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…72,83 While much of the Collagenase clinical trials literature is historical in nature is has to some degree shown the efficacy of collagenase in treating a wide variety of ulcers and burns. 68,81,[84][85][86][87] However more recently two more ''modern'' and placebo controlled trials have been carried out. A recent single-blinded, randomized study compared collagenase vs. hydrogel (SoloSite Ò Gel, Smith & Nephew, Largo, FL) for initial debridement in 27 institutionalized patients with pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Enzymatic Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…72,83 While much of the Collagenase clinical trials literature is historical in nature is has to some degree shown the efficacy of collagenase in treating a wide variety of ulcers and burns. 68,81,[84][85][86][87] However more recently two more ''modern'' and placebo controlled trials have been carried out. A recent single-blinded, randomized study compared collagenase vs. hydrogel (SoloSite Ò Gel, Smith & Nephew, Largo, FL) for initial debridement in 27 institutionalized patients with pressure ulcers.…”
Section: Enzymatic Debridementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Collagenase cream proved better in removing necrotic debris than silver sulphadiazine; however, it showed almost similar healing times (19 days for collagenase vs 22 days for silver sulphadiazine). 17 When collagenase was added with polymyxin B sulphate/bacitracin spray, the healing time was reduced to 10 days (compared to 15 days for silver sulphadiazine alone). 18 Finally, biosynthetic dressings favoured wound regeneration processes when compared in controlled, randomised trials to silver-containing products: they significantly decreased pain and total healing time (10 days vs 15 days) without increasing the cost of out-patient burn care.…”
Section: Table 5 Healing Times For the Different Dressings Used Accormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of paired treatment sites within each patient demonstrated that proportionally more CCO-treated sites were cleaned (p < 0.001) and healed (p < 0.001) before similar sites treated with silver sulfadiazine. Time to clean wound bed (mean: 9.3 vs 11.6 days) and time to epithelialization (mean: 19.0 vs 22.1 days) were both numerically faster in sites treated with CCO compared with those treated with silver sulfadiazine, but the difference did not reach statistical significance [25]. Another prospective, randomized trial comparing CCO/polymyxin with silver sulfadiazine performed in 100 children with partial-thickness burns found no differences in outcomes in skin graft rates, length of stay and hospital costs between treatment groups [29].…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Cco In Debridement Of Burnsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An examination of the individual studies included in this adverse event analysis reported infrequent pruritus, rash, edema, erythema (one case in one study), burning sensation at wound site (similar frequency between groups in several studies), burn bed infection (in a single study, seven cases with collagenase vs one case in control group), herpes infection (one case in one study), mild bleeding (one case in one study) and cellulitis (several cases in several studies). However, the risk ratio of developing cellulitis was not found to be statistically significantly different between treatment groups on subgroup analysis by Patry et al [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], and a high risk of bias was noted by the Cochrane risk of bias tool among the majority of RCTs included. The systematic review and meta-analysis contained information from some, but not all, of the more recent studies in the literature as it was limited to RCTs, excluding cohort (prospective or retrospective) studies.…”
Section: Pharmacoepidemiology Of Cco Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation