“…Peterson claims that a feminist rethinking of security must first inquire into how structural violence comes to be understood as natural and unproblematic and then work to politicize and reveal the historically contingent nature of such structures (1992a, 49). While women have long been peripheral to the decision-making processes of global capital, the international political economy can render women insecure through the gendered division of labor, the discounting of work in the home, the dictates of structural adjustment programs, the ravages of poverty, and the violence of sexual tourism and trafficking in women-all issues that generally do not get the attention of orthodox practitioners of IR (see Pettman 1996). Likewise, although the care of the environment, a transnational issue requiring collective action, is not a priority of IR theories that privilege the power and instrumental rationality of nation-states, Tickner contends that feminist configurations of security must take note of the need for global economic restructuring and urge a shift from the exploitation of nature to the reproduction of nature (1992).…”