“…The main difference during this period was the impact of population dynamics on CO2 emissions. For example, if a population decline was recorded in Russia, then the OECD population increased, which had a positive effect on CO2 emissions [8][9][10][11] (Figure 3). However, in the last decade, Russia and the OECD countries are characterized by a significant difference in the structure of the increase in CO2 emissions:…”
Currently, the economy should develop along an innovative way of development with an increase in the efficiency of the use of natural resources and a decrease in negative impacts on the environment to ensure stable economic growth and improve the quality of life of the population. The purpose of the study is to assess the environmental and energy effects that affect the environment and energy intensity in the country. The dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions in Russia are contemporaneously influenced by many different factors, such as the industry structure of the economy, the structure of the fuel and energy balance, the level of technological equipment, and the situation in world markets. Our analysis showed that the dynamics of CO2 emissions in Russia are determined primarily by the growth rates of the population’s well-being and by the growth of industrial production. At the same time, in the period 2000-2012, the effect of welfare growth was partially offset by a decrease in the energy intensity of the economy, but then the potential for reducing energy intensity due to changes in the structure of the economy was exhausted. The contribution of the technological factor is also insufficient. So for the period 2000-2017, the improvement of technologies in the field of heat and electric energy production from fossil energy sources made it possible to reduce CO2 emissions by only 33 million tons. Another significant constraint to the transition to a low-carbon trajectory of development is the low rate of implementation of energy-saving technologies in the production of energy-intensive industrial products, maintenance of residential and public buildings.
“…The main difference during this period was the impact of population dynamics on CO2 emissions. For example, if a population decline was recorded in Russia, then the OECD population increased, which had a positive effect on CO2 emissions [8][9][10][11] (Figure 3). However, in the last decade, Russia and the OECD countries are characterized by a significant difference in the structure of the increase in CO2 emissions:…”
Currently, the economy should develop along an innovative way of development with an increase in the efficiency of the use of natural resources and a decrease in negative impacts on the environment to ensure stable economic growth and improve the quality of life of the population. The purpose of the study is to assess the environmental and energy effects that affect the environment and energy intensity in the country. The dynamics of greenhouse gas emissions in Russia are contemporaneously influenced by many different factors, such as the industry structure of the economy, the structure of the fuel and energy balance, the level of technological equipment, and the situation in world markets. Our analysis showed that the dynamics of CO2 emissions in Russia are determined primarily by the growth rates of the population’s well-being and by the growth of industrial production. At the same time, in the period 2000-2012, the effect of welfare growth was partially offset by a decrease in the energy intensity of the economy, but then the potential for reducing energy intensity due to changes in the structure of the economy was exhausted. The contribution of the technological factor is also insufficient. So for the period 2000-2017, the improvement of technologies in the field of heat and electric energy production from fossil energy sources made it possible to reduce CO2 emissions by only 33 million tons. Another significant constraint to the transition to a low-carbon trajectory of development is the low rate of implementation of energy-saving technologies in the production of energy-intensive industrial products, maintenance of residential and public buildings.
“…To form comparable and observable across the whole studied period clusters the following measure will be proposed: if cluster do not change significantly in 2016 compare to 2011, so this way of clustering will be chosen. Under every received cluster, developed RES consumption model will be tested and compared to the overall model [1] for the whole sample of countries. With help of developed cluster approach the cluster distinguishing features will be identified, which allow adjusting the consumption model of renewable energy and their forecasting taking into account the state belonging to a particular cluster.…”
Section: D(xixj) = (∑(Xilxjl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the resulting groups, depending on the number of clusters, are filtered using R-squares and Fstatistics, where all indicators were previously normalized and combined into a composite indicator (C-value) (2). C = ∑(R2i×0.5+Fsti ), i∈ [1,3] (2)…”
Section: D(xixj) = (∑(Xilxjl)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cluster analysis methodology used is based on the RES consumption model developed in our previous work [1].The resulting model has the following form (3). ln(RESC)=a1 ×ln(PC)+a2×ln(Oil)+a3×ln(CI)+a4×ln(RDGDP)…”
Section: Empirical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific novelty of research consists of identification of main factors affecting the RES consumption under different clusters of countries, including institutional features of countries, oil prices level, fossil fuels security and the level of technological development; building of multi factor model based on established and systematized indicators with following verification of the significance of factors and making recommendations for countries. The development of the approach to the use of suggested factors (the prices for fossil fuels -second lag of oil prices, fossil fuels security -the ratio of production to consumption of hydrocarbons, level of institutional sphere developmentcorruption perception index, level of technology development -the share of R & D in the GDP structure) in the analysis of their impact on RES consumption was presented in our previous paper [1]. This paper will extend this analysis and apply developed model to the several clusters of observed countries.…”
The rapid development of renewable energy sources observed in recent years however has a number of limitations for different regions limited by non-price factors such as corruption and opacity of supporting institutions, lack the necessary technology to integrate renewable into the grid, lobbying and support of the interests of the owners of traditional energy sources and others. The article attempts to analyse the factors that affect the consumption of renewable energy sources in three groups of countries, pointing to the greater importance of such indicators as the share of R & d in GDP, the availability of traditional energy resources, oil prices, transparency of institutions for some countries and their lesser importance for others.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.