1986
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(86)90147-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of anthelmintics in swine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a number of publications (Powers and others 1982, Duwell and others 1986, Duncan and others 1988), the type of mean to be used in these calculations is not specified but it appears to be a commonly accepted convention that the term ‘mean’ usually refers to the arithmetic mean (Sokal and Rohlf 1969, Langley 1971, Zar 1984). Nevertheless, in the revised waavp guidelines referred to earlier (Wood and others 1995), it was stated that for calculations of percentage efficacy, ‘The geometric mean should be used as it more accurately represents the distribution of nematode populations within a group of animals and would give a more accurate indication of the degree of efficacy of a product’.…”
Section: Animal Number Untreated Control Treated Reduction (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a number of publications (Powers and others 1982, Duwell and others 1986, Duncan and others 1988), the type of mean to be used in these calculations is not specified but it appears to be a commonly accepted convention that the term ‘mean’ usually refers to the arithmetic mean (Sokal and Rohlf 1969, Langley 1971, Zar 1984). Nevertheless, in the revised waavp guidelines referred to earlier (Wood and others 1995), it was stated that for calculations of percentage efficacy, ‘The geometric mean should be used as it more accurately represents the distribution of nematode populations within a group of animals and would give a more accurate indication of the degree of efficacy of a product’.…”
Section: Animal Number Untreated Control Treated Reduction (%)mentioning
confidence: 99%