2016
DOI: 10.1177/2397002215625894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Works councils, quits and dismissals in Germany

Abstract: Works Councils, Quits and Dismissals in Germany We examine the relationship between works councils and two different types of employment separation: dismissals by the firm and voluntary quits by employees. Based on representative data from the German SocioEconomic Panel, we find a negative relationship between works councils and both kinds of separation. This is particularly true for skilled blue collar as well as qualified white collar workers compared to employees in other job categories. Additionally, we fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The treatment effect in 2004 is insignificant in all specifications, which provides evidence for a merely temporary effect on voluntary quits. A similar result is described by Grund et al (2016), who find that the formation of works councils initially increases job satisfaction, but this effect vanishes within not more than five years after formation. 21 If the dependent variable is the quit ratio instead of the number of quits, 22 the results are fairly similar: the treatment reduces the quit ratio by 0.3 percentage points, which corresponds to a reduction of about 25 percent in the mean quit rate of 1.3 percent in the group of treated establishments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The treatment effect in 2004 is insignificant in all specifications, which provides evidence for a merely temporary effect on voluntary quits. A similar result is described by Grund et al (2016), who find that the formation of works councils initially increases job satisfaction, but this effect vanishes within not more than five years after formation. 21 If the dependent variable is the quit ratio instead of the number of quits, 22 the results are fairly similar: the treatment reduces the quit ratio by 0.3 percentage points, which corresponds to a reduction of about 25 percent in the mean quit rate of 1.3 percent in the group of treated establishments.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Nevertheless, even for an unusually high quit rate of up to 10 percent, the effect appears to be substantial in magnitude. Using data from the Socio-economic Panel, Grund et al (2016) find that works councils are associated with a 1.2 percentage point lower quit rate, which corresponds to a 27 percent difference in voluntary quits between establishments with and without a works council, respectively. Pfeifer (2007) reports that the existence of a works council is associated with 20 percent fewer voluntary quits, whereas the difference is 30 percent when works councils and collective agreements co-exist.…”
Section: Effects Of Work Councils On Quits: Theory and Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using plant‐level data, Frick (1996) finds that works council existence is related to fewer quits and, among others, Addison et al. (2001), Frick and Möller (2003), Pfeifer (2011) and Grund, Martin and Schmitt (2016) confirm that turnover is reduced. Whether these are indeed direct “collective voice” effects or whether they are rather rent‐seeking effects is analyzed by Hirsch et al.…”
Section: Institutional Setting Theory and Some Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Works councils also reduce personnel turnover (Frick and Moeller , Grund et al. , Pfeifer ), foster internal labor markets (Heywood et al. , Zwick ) and help avoid labor shortages (Backes‐Gellner and Tuor ).…”
Section: The German Experience With Work Councilsmentioning
confidence: 99%