Workplace accommodations for employees with disabilities: A multilevel model of employer decision-making.

Abstract

Purpose: Existing research suggests that the decision to grant or deny workplace accommodations for people with disabilities is influenced by a range of legal and non-legal factors. However, less is known about how these factors operate at the within-person level. Thus, we proposed and tested a multilevel model of the accommodation decision-making process, which we applied to better understand why people with psychological disabilities often experience greater challenges in obtaining accommodations. Method: A sample of 159 Australian adults, composed mostly of managers and HR professionals, read 12 vignettes involving requests for accommodations from existing employees. The requests differed in whether they were for psychological or physical disabilities. For each vignette, participants rated their empathy with the employee, the legitimacy of the employee's disability, the necessity for productivity, the perceived cost, and the reasonableness, and indicated whether they would grant the accommodation. Results: Multilevel modeling indicated that greater empathy, legitimacy, and necessity, and lower perceived cost predicted perceptions of greater reasonableness and greater granting. Accommodation requests from employees with psychological disabilities were seen as less reasonable and were less likely to be granted; much of this effect seemed to be driven by perceptions that such accommodations were less necessary for productivity. Ratings on accommodations were influenced both by general between-person tendencies and within-person appraisals of particular scenarios. Conclusions: The study points to a need for organizations to more clearly establish guidelines for how decision-makers should fairly evaluate accommodation requests for employees with psychological disabilities and disability more broadly.1 APA owns the copyright to this work. This article may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. The link provided by the above doi links to the copy of record.2 Apsara Telwatte, Jeromy Anglim, Sarah K. A. Wynton, and Richard Moulding School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jeromy Anglim, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, 3220 Australia. Email: jeromy.anglim@deakin.edu.au WORKPLACE ACCOMMODATIONS 2 Keywords: accommodations, disability, psychological disability, discrimination, vignettes Impact (Point 1) Only limited research has examined employer decision-making behavior when evaluating workplace accommodations and less is known about the disability and accommodation characteristics that influence the employer decisionmaking process. This current study offers several advances over existing research including (a) a non-student sample of human resource professionals and managers, (b) responses in relation to a large number of accommodation scenarios, (c) measurement of employer characteristics, and (d) a multilevel modeling approac...

Predicting employee attitudes to workplace diversity from personality, values, and cognitive ability

“…Third, the measures of workplace prejudice were worded relatively directly. Future research should also explore more indirect and subtle forms of prejudice such as responses to vignette studies around CV selection, promotion decision-making, project allocation, and workplace requests (Telwatte, Anglim, Wynton, & Moulding, 2017). Similarly, future research should seek to obtain measures of attitudes to workplace diversity using well-acquainted informants such as spouses, close friends, and family members.…”

Employability of Disabled Graduates: Resources for a Sustainable Employment

“…Similarly, there are accommodations today that did not exist in earlier generations, such as telecommuting, which may allow people who have mental disabilities to keep working [16]. A range of factors may influence decision-makers, such as the employers' empathy toward the employee, their attitudes toward people with disabilities, their experience, and their knowledge of disability legislation [67]. The graduates reported more positive experiences, when specialist and generic HR, line managers, colleagues, and they themselves had more experience of disability.…”

Employers’ perspectives of including young people with disabilities in the workforce, disability disclosure and providing accommodations

“…Employers often lack knowledge of how to provide accommodations, and what accommodations they should provide to individuals with disabilities (Chen et al, 2016). A recent 2017 study showed that employers are more likely to grant workplace accommodations and see them as reasonable if employers are knowledgeable about disability legislation, have experience working with people with disabilities, and hold positive attitudes towards these individuals (Telwatte, Anglim, Wynton, & Moulding, 2017). Research also highlights that employers are more willing to provide workplace accommodations to people with visible or physical disabilities rather than invisible or psychological disabilities (Lindsay, Cagliostro, et al, 2017;Prince, 2017;Telwatte et al, 2017).…”