1997
DOI: 10.12930/0271-9517-17.1.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working With Undecided Students: A Hands-on Strategy

Abstract: Based on a concept described by the authors as “The Myth of the Academic Major,” a scheme for working with students who are undecided about their choice of major or career was developed. This scheme is a hands-on, time-limited method for using students' self-descriptions, rather than the institution's structure (e.g., lists of curricula), as the starting point for dialogue that points students in academic directions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Successful application of the Engagement Model for Academic Advising pairs the student-advisee with an appropriate professor-adviser with the objective of providing mutually rewarding learning and training in a particular academic area of shared interest. Consistent with the findings of Schein and Laff (1997), this model of academic advising focuses on the goals and objectives of the incoming students, paired with faculty-mentors who likely share the same interests. If success is defined as the creation of mutually rewarding relationships resulting in the initiation-induction process of commencement, then the Engagement Model of Academic Advising seems to illustrate one possible approach to achieving that end.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Successful application of the Engagement Model for Academic Advising pairs the student-advisee with an appropriate professor-adviser with the objective of providing mutually rewarding learning and training in a particular academic area of shared interest. Consistent with the findings of Schein and Laff (1997), this model of academic advising focuses on the goals and objectives of the incoming students, paired with faculty-mentors who likely share the same interests. If success is defined as the creation of mutually rewarding relationships resulting in the initiation-induction process of commencement, then the Engagement Model of Academic Advising seems to illustrate one possible approach to achieving that end.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…There is some debate on what role student academic advising has in effectively addressing the goals of the students, academic units, and institutions (see Greenwood, 1998;Schein & Laff, 1997;Schneider, 1998;Turkey, 1996). In the current discourse on the purpose of tenure, Greenwood noted that effective tenure policies can attract scholars who are willing to devote time and attention to the increasingly unpopular task of student academic advising.…”
Section: Current Th In K1 N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final academic variable, major, was not significantly related to retention. Given the literature does not provide an overwhelming consensus regarding the impact of major, it is not surprising this variable is of minimal value to predict retention (Knight, 1994;Kroc, Howard, Hull, & Woodard, 1997;Schein & Laff, 1997). These results, however, do not suggest that coaches and administrators should ignore a student's choice of major.…”
Section: Academic Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only do they want to retain matriculated students, but budgets for programs and majors are often driven by numbers of declared majors. Institutions appreciate students who fit into preexisting institutional structures (Schein & Laff, 1997); therefore, academic advisors ordinarily work toward the goal of retaining students and avoiding attrition, even when they recognize signs that advisees may be foreclosures.…”
Section: Identity Development Processes and Foreclosure As An Identitmentioning
confidence: 99%