2002
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-490x.2002.tb00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Engagement Model for Effective Academic Advising With Undergraduate College Students and Student Organizations

Abstract: This article introduces and discusses the efficacy of an engagement approach to undergraduate college student academic advising. The Engagement Model for Academic Advising involves relationship building between the student‐advisee and the professor‐mentor to enhance student self‐efficacy for completing the degree requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If a trusting relationship cannot be established early in the advising process, the advisor-advisee partnership will likely not reach full potential. This crucial introductory practice supports Alexitch's (2002) and Yarbrough's (2002) contention that a personal relationship between the academic advisor and the student is important for student satisfaction, academic success, and reten tion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If a trusting relationship cannot be established early in the advising process, the advisor-advisee partnership will likely not reach full potential. This crucial introductory practice supports Alexitch's (2002) and Yarbrough's (2002) contention that a personal relationship between the academic advisor and the student is important for student satisfaction, academic success, and reten tion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For students who have not yet decided upon a major as they transition from high school to college, academic advisors serve as primary connections to the institution. The relationship between the academic advisor and the student facilitates these students' satisfaction, success, and retention (Alexitch, 2002;Habley & Morales, 1998;Yarbrough, 2002). Successful retention programs incorporate effective advising for stu dents who enter college undecided in their majors (Tinto, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study suggest this is especially important for transfer students, who typically have less time on campus to become involved and, therefore, less time to take on meaningful leadership roles. While, some resources are available to inform the development of these experiences (Dunkel & Schuh, 1998;Yarbrough, 2002), additional research is needed to identify specific characteristics or activities of extracurricular involvement that are most likely to increase leadership outcomes. This information would be very valuable as educators work with student leaders to create meaningful experiences.…”
Section: Implications and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [Crookston, 1972;O'Banion, 1972]. models of academic advising, it is reasonably viewed as being too reductive, and a number of additional alternatives to prescriptive advising have been developed; these include the engagement model [-Yarbrough, 2002] and the collaborative model [Lowenstein, 1999]. For present purposes, we needn't be concerned with the differences among these non-prescriptive models, which are minor and tend to focus on the components of the advising session.The salient point for us is that, while prescriptive advising is curriculum-centered, non-prescriptive is student-centered: it focuses on helping students develop "the skills and behaviors needed to become a learner and expands the domain of concern to include learning through the whole college experience" [Melander, 2002] (quot.…”
Section: The Distinction First Articulated By Burns Crookston and Imentioning
confidence: 99%