Working with public contributors to improve the patient experience at the Manchester Clinical Research Facility: an evaluation of the Experience Based Design approach

Abstract

Plain English summaryThe Experience Based Design (EBD) approach involves patients, staff and members of the public working together to improve a service. This paper evaluates the methods that are used to involve patients and members of the public in a project that aimed to improve the patient experience at Manchester Clinical Research Facility (MCRF). The aim was to explore what helps staff and members of the public to work well together.An evaluation questionnaire was used to get feedback from staff and public contributors. Questions included whether each person felt that they were able to shape the project; if they received enough training; whether they had enough time to complete each task; how well they thought the group worked together; and what could be improved. The findings showed that both staff and public contributors felt valued and that they were able to shape the project from the beginning. Training in EBD and research methodology, and providing enough time to complete each task helped to build relationships and increase confidence when contributing to the project. Personal benefits included a feeling of ownership over a worthwhile and rewarding project, increased awareness of public involvement and gaining new skills. The recommendations for successful involvement of patients and the public in EBD projects will hopefully be helpful for similar projects in the future.Abstract Background The Experience Based Design (EBD) approach promotes the effective involvement of patients and public contributors by enabling patients, public contributors and staff to co-design projects that aim to improve the patient experience. This approach allows patients and members of the public to have a role in shaping and improving current services. This paper aims to evaluate the EBD process from a public involvement perspective, exploring the barriers and facilitators to building successful working relationships. Methods An open-ended evaluation questionnaire was developed to gain feedback from staff and public contributors who co-produced an EBD project that aimed to improve the patient experience at Manchester CRF. Questions explored what worked well, how the project could be improved, and the benefits of being involved. Results Our findings highlight the importance of providing opportunities for staff, patients and members of the public to build relationships in order to feel confident in voicing their opinions. This can be achieved by training both staff and public contributors in EBD methodology to reduce any power imbalance that may exist. Negotiating adequate time to complete tasks and debate the best way forward also allows everyone to fully contribute to the project. Each individual felt that their contribution was valued and that they shaped the final action plan. Both public contributors and staff listed a number of personal benefits from their involvement in the project. This included a feeling of ownership over a worthwhile and rewarding project, increased awareness of public involvement in EBD projects and g...

How mHealth can facilitate collaboration in diabetes care: qualitative analysis of co-design workshops

“…Experience-based co-design (EBCD) (hereby referred to as co-design) allows patients, and providers to impose their collaborative insights on the design and development of the tools and services that they are eventually meant to use [ 16 ]. “Happenings become experiences when they are digested, when they are reflected on, related to general patterns and synthesised” [ 17 ].…”

Patient Participation in Service Improvement of Primary Care Services

“…In fact, the annual planning method capacity building only includes one employee and the coordinator of each Health Center. However, for the successful implementation of a method, it is indicated that all the stakeholders involved in the process to be trained on it (BAYLISS et al, 2017;CAMPOS, 1992;ISHIKAWA, 1986). The evaluation and adjustments phases of the process do not present the same level of detail in activities like others and they are only monitored in terms of whether the planned actions are being executed as scheduled.…”

How mHealth can facilitate collaboration in diabetes care: qualitative analysis of co-design workshops

“…However, other studies also show that when both end-user groups were engaged together in development discussions, more concrete and realistic solutions can be identi ed [15]. Experience-based co-design (EBCD) (hereby referred to as co-design) allows patients, and providers to impose their collaborative insights on the design and development of the tools and services that they are eventually meant to use [16]. "Happenings become experiences when they are digested, when they are re ected on, related to general patterns and synthesised" [17].…”