2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.12.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory span capacity improved by a D2 but not D1 receptor family agonist

Abstract: Patients with schizophrenia exhibit poor working memory (WM). Although several subcomponents of WM can be measured, evidence suggests the primary subcomponent affected in schizophrenia is span capacity (WMC). Indeed, the NIMH-funded MATRICS initiative recommended assaying the WMC when assessing the efficacy of a putative therapeutic for FDA approval. Although dopamine D1 receptor agonists improve delay-dependent memory in animals, evidence for improvements in WMC due to dopamine D1 receptor activation is limit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with the present results there are evidence showing that SCH23390 (Rezayof et al, 2007;, SKF38393 (Zarrindast et al, 2012), and sulpiride (Hale and Crowe, 2003) impaired learning and memory. Nevertheless, some investigators indicted that SCH23390 (Nasehi et al, 2010), SKF38393 (Tarantino et al, 2011), sulpiride (Rezayof et al, 2007;Nasehi et al, 2010), and quinpirole (Rezayof et al, 2007), had no effect on learning and memory. The controversial results may be due to methods, route of injection and/or the doses of drugs used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In agreement with the present results there are evidence showing that SCH23390 (Rezayof et al, 2007;, SKF38393 (Zarrindast et al, 2012), and sulpiride (Hale and Crowe, 2003) impaired learning and memory. Nevertheless, some investigators indicted that SCH23390 (Nasehi et al, 2010), SKF38393 (Tarantino et al, 2011), sulpiride (Rezayof et al, 2007;Nasehi et al, 2010), and quinpirole (Rezayof et al, 2007), had no effect on learning and memory. The controversial results may be due to methods, route of injection and/or the doses of drugs used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hence, tasks such as the Iowa Gambling Task [72] could be used to determine putative changes in ‘mood state’ in these mice resulting from environmental challenges [3]. Hence, future studies will determine the neurocognitive performance of the Clock △19 mutant mice, such as attention in a continuous performance test [73, 74], spatial working memory [75, 76], and decision-making under risk conditions in an Iowa Gambling Task [49, 50]. Such studies will be vital in the future given the correlation between cognition and a subject’s functional capabilities [77, 78].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, pharmacological validation has yet to be determined between the human and rodent RAMs. Improvements in performance can be seen however in healthy rats using nicotine and nicotinic agonists (Levin et al, 1990, Levin, 2002, Levin et al, 2009), as well as dopamine D 2 family agonists (Tarantino et al, 2011). Although there is limited evidence for nicotine improving traditional measures of working memory in humans, the same D 2 family agonist improved human spatial working memory span capacity in subjects with poor span capacity (Mehta et al, 2001, Gibbs and D'esposito, 2006).…”
Section: Cross-species Cognitive Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%