2015
DOI: 10.21832/9781783093595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory in Second Language Acquisition and Processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the effect of working memory measures on L2 acquisition and processing has been much more controversial (see Juffs, 2004; Wen et al, 2015). McDonald (2006) showed that bilinguals’ grammaticality judgements were affected by low WM capacity, insufficient decoding abilities and slower processing speeds compared to native speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the effect of working memory measures on L2 acquisition and processing has been much more controversial (see Juffs, 2004; Wen et al, 2015). McDonald (2006) showed that bilinguals’ grammaticality judgements were affected by low WM capacity, insufficient decoding abilities and slower processing speeds compared to native speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content video provides a large amount of information input such as pictures, objects, and real scenes (Dehghani and Jowkar, 2012 ; Pardo-Ballester, 2016 ; Green, 2017 ). Compared with context video, it is seen by some to significantly improve the overall understanding level of learners; but it does not help learners understand the uncommon words they listen to and may even interfere with phonological and vocabulary memory (Gathercole and Baddeley, 2014 ; Wen et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content video provides a large amount of information input such as pictures, objects, and real scenes (Dehghani and Jowkar, 2012;Pardo-Ballester, 2016;Green, 2017). Compared with context video, it is seen by some to significantly improve the overall understanding level of learners; but it does not help learners understand the uncommon words they listen to and may even interfere with phonological and vocabulary memory (Gathercole and Baddeley, 2014;Wen et al, 2015). Gabeur et al (2020) also argues that the content video input provides more information that is beneficial to listeners' understanding to a certain extent because the scene video only presents the image of the speaker or a fixed scene, the learning process is relatively rigid.…”
Section: Nature Of the Visual Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executive function also influences L2 ability development in older preschool children. Theoretically, EF plays a critical role in the process of second-language learning in bilingual children (e.g., Wen, 2012;Wen et al, 2015). For example, if an auditory input of a vocabulary word activates the meaning representation in both languages, it is necessary for children to cognitively enhance the targeted activation and suppress the other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%