2011
DOI: 10.22456/2238-8915.28843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working Memory Capacity and Lexical Density in L2 Speech Production

Abstract: Este estudo investiga a relação entre a capacidade de memó-ria de trabalho e a densidade lexical (DL) no desempenho oral e no de-senvolvimento da habilidade de produção oral em L2. Os 45 participan-tes deste estudo foram submetidos a duas coletas de dados, cada umaconsistindo de um teste de amplitude de memória de trabalho duranteo desempenho oral, adaptado de Daneman (1991), e de uma tarefa deprodução oral em L2, com um intervalo de doze semanas entre elas.A DL foi determinada pela proporção de itens lexicais… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that memory span, naming rate and speech rate are in a linear function to reading ability and good readers do better in all three tests than poor readers (Das & Mishra, 1991). Researchers also found a strong relationship between working memory span and L2 performance (Fortkamp, 1999;Harrington & Sawyer, 1992;Kormos & Sáfár, 2008;Weissheimer & Mailce, 2009).…”
Section: Memory Spanmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that memory span, naming rate and speech rate are in a linear function to reading ability and good readers do better in all three tests than poor readers (Das & Mishra, 1991). Researchers also found a strong relationship between working memory span and L2 performance (Fortkamp, 1999;Harrington & Sawyer, 1992;Kormos & Sáfár, 2008;Weissheimer & Mailce, 2009).…”
Section: Memory Spanmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Past research in reading has primarily looked at working memory span, which is a common measure of short-term memory (Fortkamp, 1999;Kormos & Sáfár, 2008;Weissheimer & Mailce, 2009). While short-term memory is thought of as a passive storage buffer, working memory span is widely defined as the mental capacity available for the simultaneous processing and storage of information, and thus a more active part of the human processing system (Daneman & Carpenter, 1980;Just & Carpenter, 1992).…”
Section: Memory Spanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that limitations in individuals' working memory capacity (WMC) may be seen as a possible independent constraint on the processes involved in L1 speech production (DANEMAN;GREEN, 1986;DANEMAN, 1991), L2 speech production (FORTKAMP, 2000;FINARDI;PREBIANCA, 2006;XHAFAJ, 2006) and more recently L2 speech development (FINARDI;FINARDI;WEISSHEIMER, 2011;WEISSHEIMER;. These studies have shown that, in general, individuals with a larger WMC tend to outperform those with a smaller capacity in various aspects of language performance and acquisition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Payne et al (2009) claimed WM independently influenced L2 reading regardless of previous L2 learning, Walter (2004) found out substantial difference between lower and higher proficiency L2 learners in L2 WM capacity and transferability of L1 reading skills to L2, suggesting an intricate interrelationship among WM, L2 proficiency, and L2 reading comprehension. In addition, the facilitating effect of WM capacity on L2 processing was claimed more salient with low proficiency L2 learners in Hummel (2009), and Weissheimer and Mota (2009), while recently Joh and Plakans (2017) found the opposite.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 92%